Biological Properties of White Portland Cement and the Effects of Nano-Silica on Its Mechanical Strength for Bone Substitute Applications

Main Article Content

Tanaratchanon Suthi
Ratchawoot Sutthi
Sirawit Nonkham
Teerawat Laonapakul

Abstract

White Portland Cement (WPC) is a ceramic material primarily composed of tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate, with a ferric oxide content of less than 0.5%. This composition makes it suitable for medical applications, particularly in orthopedic and dental surgery. This study focuses on developing composite material by incorporating nano-silica into WPC to enhance its mechanical and biological properties. The primary objective is to evaluate the biocompatibility and mechanical performance of the material through in vitro testing, including immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF) and cytotoxicity assessment on osteoblast cells. The results indicate that WPC exhibits both osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, as evidenced by hydroxyapatite formation on its surface after 28 days of immersion in SBF. Cytotoxicity testing revealed that higher material concentrations reduced cell viability due to the release of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂), which may increase alkalinity beyond biocompatible levels. Regarding mechanical properties, the addition of nano-silica at 1%, 2%, and 3% significantly enhanced the material’s compressive strength. The highest compressive strength, 58.12 MPa, was observed at a 3% nano-silica concentration, attributed to structural reinforcement, reduced porosity, and increased formation of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel, a key component in improving mechanical strength. These findings demonstrate that the development of a WPC-nano-silica composite enhances both mechanical and biological properties, highlighting its potential as a bone substitute material for medical applications.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suthi, T., Sutthi, R. ., Nonkham, S. ., & Laonapakul, T. (2026). Biological Properties of White Portland Cement and the Effects of Nano-Silica on Its Mechanical Strength for Bone Substitute Applications. Thai Industrial Engineering Network Journal, 12(1). retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ienj/article/view/258943
Section
Research and Review Article

References

W. Taptimdee, P. Chindaprasirt, Y. Otsuka, Y. Mutoh and T. Laonapakul, Strength and bioactivity of hydroxyapatite/white portland cement (HAp/WPC) under Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) solution, In Materials Science Forum (Vol. 975, pp. 88-93).

P. Torkittikul and A. Chaipanich, 2009. “Investigation of the mechanical and in vitro biological properties of ordinary and white Portland cements”. Sci Asia, vol 35(4): 358-64.

P. Taddei, A. Tinti, M. G.Gandolfi, P. L. Rossi and C. Prati. 2009. “Vibrational study on the bioactivity of Portland cement-based materials for endodontic use”. Journal of Molecular Structure, Vol 924: 548-554.

L. L. Hench. 1991. “Bioceramics: from concept to clinic”. Journal of the american ceramic society, Vol 74 (7): 1487-1510.

L. N. Niu, K. Jiao, W. Zhang, J. Camilleri, B. E. Bergeron, H. L. Feng, J. Mao, J.H. Chen, D.H. Pashley and F. R. Tay. 2014. “A review of the bioactivity of hydraulic calcium silicate cements”. Journal of dentistry, Vol 42 (5): 517-533.

F. R. Tay, D. H. Pashley, F. A. Rueggeberg, R. J. Loushine and R. N. Weller. 2007. “Calcium phosphate phase transformation produced by the interaction of the Portland cement component of white mineral trioxide aggregate with a phosphate-containing fluid”. Journal of endodontics, Vol 33 (11): 1347-1351.

P. P. Abhilash, D. K. Nayak, B. Sangoju, R. Kumar, and V. Kumar. 2021. “Effect of nano-silica in concrete; a review”. Construction and Building Materials, Vol 278, 122347.

M. Vallet-Regi. Bio-ceramics with clinical applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

S. Heinemann, T. Coradin, H. Worch, H. P. Wiesmann and T. Hanke. 2011. “How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials”. Composites science and technology, Vol 71 (16): 1873-1880.

Jones, J. R. 2013. “Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids”. Acta biomaterialia, Vol 9 (1): 4457-4486.

M. J. Coathup, S. Samizadeh, Y. S. Fang, T. Buckland, K. A. Hing and G. W. Blunn. 2011. “The osteoinductivity of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate”. JBJS, Vol 93(23): 2219-2226.

N Lv., H He., J. Li., X. Zhang., J. Chen, J. Fan. 2025. “Binary collaboration of carboxyl‐functionalized mesoporous silica microspheres and sliver nanoparticle improved imidacloprid bioactivity towards insecticide-resistance insect pests”. Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol 507: 160386.

S. Chirra, S. R. Gujjula, S. Manda, S. Goskula, V. Narayanan. 2024. “Fabrication of porous nano silica materials by template-assisted strategy for controlled drug delivery studies”. Journal of Porous Materials :1-12.

C. Chen, Y. Xie, Q. Zhang, J. Cao, J. Lin, X. Tong, Y. Wu, P. Gao, J. Ma. 2025. “Amphiphilic Janus Nanoparticles for a Superhydrophobic Coating on the Enamel Surface to Prevent Caries”. Materials Today Bio :101627.

S. Jeyan, G. G. Subramaniyan, J. Chandru, D. Barathraj, P. Mohanraj. 2024. “Experimental Investigation and Finite Element Analysis of Novel Dental Restorations Material”. In Advances in Additive Manufacturing Technologies :98-102.

T. Kokubo and H. Takadama. 2006. “How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?”. Biomaterials, Vol 27 (15): 2907-2915.

ASTM C109/C109M, 2021. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in). or [50-mm] Cube Specimens.) ASTM International. West Conshohocken: PA.

L. C. Palmer, C. J. Newcomb, S. R. Kaltz, E. D. Spoerke and S. I. Stupp. 2008. “Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel”. Chemical reviews, Vol 108 (11): 4754-4783.

A. M. Shafeek, M. H. Khedr, S. I. El-Dek and N. Shehata. 2020. “Influence of ZnO nanoparticle ratio and size on mechanical properties and whiteness of White Portland Cement”. Applied Nanoscience, Vol 10 (9): 3603-3615.

S. Raynaud, E. Champion, D. Bernache-Assollant and P. Thomas. 2002. “Calcium phosphate apatite with variable

Ca/P atomic ratio I. Systhesis, characterization and thermal stability of powders”. Biomaterials, Vol 23 (4): 1065-1072.

agents: a cell death study”. Journal of Endodontics, Vol 37 (2): 203-210.

A. L. G. Cornélio, L. P. Salles, M. C. da Paz, J. A. Cirelli, J. M. Guerreiro-Tanomaru and M. Tanomaru Filho. 2011. “Cytotoxicity of Portland cement with different radiopacifying agents: a cell death study”. Journal of Endodontics, Vol 37 (2): 203-210.

A. M. Galow, A. Rebl, D. Koczan, S. M. Bonk, W. Baumann and J. Gimsa. 2017. “Increased osteoblast viability at alkaline pH in vitro provides a new perspective on bone regeneration”. Biochemistry and biophysics reports, Vol 10: 17-25.

B. W. Jo, C. H. Kim, G. H. Tae and J. B. Park. 2007. “Characteristics of cement mortar with nano-SiO2 particles”. Construction and building materials, Vol 21 (6): 1351-1355.

K. Sobolev, I. Flores, R. Hermosillo and L. M. Torres-Martínez. 2006. “Nanomaterials and nanotechnology for high-performance cement composite”. Proceeding of ACI session on nanotechnology of concrete: recent developments and future perspectives, Vol 7: 93-120.