Author Guidelines

Interested in submitting to this journal? We recommend that you review the About the Journal page for the journal's section policies, as well as the Author Guidelines. Authors need to register with the journal prior to submitting or, if already registered, can simply log in and begin the five-step process. 

"The peer-review process"

The peer-review process can be broadly summarized into 9 steps, although these steps can vary slightly between journals. Explore what’s involved, below.

1. Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the article to the journal. This is usually via an online system.

2. Editorial Office Assessment

The journal checks the article’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. The quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.

3. Evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC)

The EIC checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

4. EIC Assigns a Section Editor (SE)

The EIC assigned the appropriate SE who handle the peer review.

5. Invitation to Reviewers

The SE sends invitations to appropriate reviewers. As responses are received, further invitations are issued, if necessary, until the required number of acceptances is obtained – commonly this is 2.

 6. Review is Conducted

The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it – or else with a request for revision before it is reconsidered.

7. Journal Evaluates the Reviews

The SE considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer to get an extra opinion before making a decision.

8. The Decision is Communicated

The SE sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments.

9. Next Steps

If accepted, the paper is sent to production.

If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the SE should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review.

If the paper was sent back for revision, the reviewers should expect to receive a new version. However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor.

Author Guidelines: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ehMHBWPrsJCaqaDhBnNQfRIHuw-_u98_hGHVMPGH01I/edit

Any fees or charges are not required for manuscript processing and/or publishing materials.

Manuscript submission

The Progress in Applied Science and Technology operates an online submission and peer review system that allows authors to submit manuscripts online and track their progress via a Thaijo web (https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/past/index). IMPORTANT: Please check whether you already have an account in the system before trying to create a new one. If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year you will likely have had an account created. File types of submitted manuscripts preferred formats in .doc or pdf. containing all tables and figures.

Manuscript preparation

1. Important: The Aims and Scope of Progress in Applied Science and Technology are described in detail in ‘Aims and scope’ Menu. Please read it before submitting a new manuscript.

2. Types of the manuscript: Research articles and Review articles

3. Manuscript style: The language of the journal is English. Please write your manuscript in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these) in Cambria Math font. Figures and tables must be incorporated into the main text. The corresponding author should be identified. Names and affiliations of all authors must be given.

3.1 Title:   Should be concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible.

3.2 Abstract: The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. An abstract is often presented separately from the article, so it must be able to stand alone. No longer than 250 words or 15 lines. (Cambria Math 9)

3.3 Keywords: Provide 3-6 keywords. Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of four keywords. Each keyword should be accompanied by the capital letter denoting the category from which the keyword has been selected, separated by commas. (Cambria Math 9)

3.4 Introduction: The introduction must provide the context and significance of the research being conducted by summarizing current understanding and background information about the topic, stating the purpose of the work in the form of the research problem supported by a hypothesis or a set of questions, briefly explaining the methodological approach used to examine the research problem, highlighting the potential outcomes your study can reveal, and outlining the remaining structure of the paper.

3.5 Materials and Experiment: Describes the materials and tools, experimental designs in a research study. Provide sufficient details to allow the work to be reproduced by an independent researcher. Methods that are already published should be summarized and indicated by a reference. (Cambria Math9)

3.6 Results and Discussion: This section should contain “Results” and discuss them by commenting on the results obtained, interpreting what the results mean and explaining any unexpected results.

3.7 Conclusions: This chapter reports the conclusions and recommendations that resulted from this study. State conclusion (do not summarize) briefly. (Cambria Math 9)

3.8 Math formulae: please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Present simple formulae in line with normal text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small fractional terms, e.g., X/Y. In principle, variables are to be presented in italics. Powers of e are often more conveniently denoted by exp. Number consecutively any equations that have to be displayed separately from the text (if referred to explicitly in the text). Figures: (graphs, charts, line drawings, photographs).

3.9 Figures:  Graphical analysis and errors (TIFF or JPEG): Color or grayscale photographs (halftones) keep to a minimum of 300 dpi. Supply captions separately, not attached to the figure, immediately below the figure. A caption should comprise a brief title and a description of the illustration. Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explain all symbols and abbreviations used.

3.10 Table: Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Tables can be placed either next to the relevant text in the article. Number tables consecutively by their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the main text. Please avoid using vertical rules and shading in table cells

3.11 Acknowledgments: come at the end of a manuscript after the conclusions and before the references. List sources of financial or material support and the names of individuals whose contributions were significant but not deserving of authorship.

3.12 References: The references will number citations consecutively within square brackets (1). The sentence punctuation follows the square bracket (2). Refer simply to the reference number, as in (3)—do not use “Ref. (3)” or “reference (3)” except at the beginning of a sentence: “Reference (3) was the first . . .” List: Number the references (numbers in square brackets) in the list in the order in which they appear in the text. (Cambria Math 9). You can automatically format references from your Endnote citation manager using Vancouver style. It is available on:

https://endnote.com/style_download/vancouver/

Examples:

Journals :

(1) Khetkorn W, Incharoensakdi A, Lindblad P, Jantaro S. Enhancement of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by overexpression of its native biosynthetic genes. Bioresource technology. 2016;214:761-8.

Texts :

(2) Brandrup, J., Immergut, EH, Grulke, EA, Polymer Handbook. 4th ed : Wiley: New York; 1999           

Chapter in an Edited Text :

(3) Gilbert RJ, editor. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins: Springer; 2010.

Proceedings :

(4) Teeka P, Chaiyasat A, Chaiyasat P. Preparation of poly (methyl methacrylate) microcapsule with encapsulated jasmine oil.  Energy procedia2014. p. 181-6.     

Thesis / Dissertation :

(5) Guikema JW. Scanning Hall Probe Microscopy of Magnetic Vortices in Very Underdoped yttrium-barium-copper-oxide: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC); 2005.          

Patents :

(6) Stannard JG, inventor; Google Patents, assignee. Polymerizable dental barrier material 2007.