Effect of lignite fly ash and rice husk ash ratios on physical properties of lightweight porous geopolymers fabricated by pore-forming agent method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, the porous lightweight geopolymer used lignite fly ash (FA) and rice husk ash (RHA) derived from the local source. The prepared geopolymer slurry was a mixture of FA, RHA, and alkaline solution activators which consisted of Na2 SiO3 and 10 M of NaOH solution. RHA was applied to replace FA content in the 10-50% ratio by weight. The ratio of solid (fly ash and rice husk ash) and liquid (Na2 SiO3 and NaOH) is 0.6, while the ratio of Na2 SiO3 and NaOH is 3. Powder of sponge was employed to create the porous geopolymer materials in 0.5 % by weight. The fresh slurry was poured into cube plastic molds for porous geopolymer casting. Then, the porous geopolymer was cured at 60 oC for 48 hours and 7 days at room temperature. After sintering at 700 oC for 2 hours, the specimens were examined. The micrographs of surface characteristics show an enlarged pore size with increasing RHA amount, corresponding to the % shrinkage/expansion of the specimens. The XRD patterns shows an increase in quartz content by increasing RHA. The water absorption increases with increasing the amount of RHA, related to the porosity. It was found that the amount of RHA can improve the physical properties of geopolymer materials which increases the porosity value when increasing the amount of RHA.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alehyen, S., Zerzouri, M., ELalouani, M., El Achouri, M. & Taibi, M. (2017). Porosity and fire resistance of fly ash based geopolymer. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences, 8(10), 3676-3689.
ASTM International. (2006). ASTM C 373-88-Standard Test Method for Water Absorption, Bulk Density, Apparent Porosity, and Apparent Specific Gravity of Fired Whiteware Products.
ASTM International. Bai, C., Franchin, G., Elsayed, H., Conte, A. & Colombo, P. (2016). High strength metakaolin-based geopolymer foams with variable macroporous structure. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 36(16), 4243- 4249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jeurceramsoc.2016.06.045.
Bai, C., Franchin, G., Elsayed, H., Zaggia, A., Conte, L., Li, H. & Colombo, P. (2017). High-porosity geopolymer foams with tailored porosity for thermal insulation and wastewater treatment. Journal of Materials Research, 32(17), 3251-3259. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.127
Beaino, S., El Hage, P., Sonnier, R., Seif, S., & El Hage, R. (2022). Novel foaming-agent free insulating geopolymer based on industrial fly ash and rice husk. Molecules, 27(2), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/ molecules27020531.
Benhelal, E., Zahedi, G., Shamsaei, E., & Bahadori, A. (2013). Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 142-161. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. jclepro.2012.10.049.
Davidovits, J. (2013). Geopolymer cement a review. Geopolymer Institute. Detphan, S. & Chindaprasirt, P. (2009). Preparation of fly ash and rice husk ash geopolymer. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 16(6), 720-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1674- 4799(10)60019-2.
Duan, P., Yan, C., Zhou, W., Luo, W. & Shen, C. (2015). An investigation of the microstructure and durability of a fluidized bed fly ash-metakaolin geopolymer after heat and acid exposure. Materials & Design, 74, 125-137. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. matdes.2015.03.009.
Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J.L., Lukey, G.C., Palomo, A. & van Deventer, J.S. (2007). Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9), 2917-2933. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.
Farhan, N.A., Sheikh, M.N. & Hadi, M.N. (2019). Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 196, 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2018.11.083.
Franchin, G. & Colombo, P. (2015). Porous geopolymer components through inverse replica of 3D printed sacrificial templates. Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology, 6(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/ 10.4416/JCST2014-00057.
He, J., Jie, Y., Zhang, J., Yu, Y. & Zhang, G. (2013). Synthesis and characterization of red mud and rice husk ash-based geopolymer composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 37, 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cemconcomp.2012.11.010.
Kioupis, D., Kavakakis, C., Tsivilis, S. & Kakali, G. (2018). Synthesis and characterization of porous fly ash-based geopolymers using Si as foaming agent. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018.
Malhotra, V.M. (2002). Introduction: sustainable development and concrete technology. Concrete International, 24(7), 22.
Nath, P. & Sarker, P.K. (2014). Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building materials, 66, 163- 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2014.05.080.
Nochaiya, T., Wongkeo, W. & Chaipanich, A. (2010). Utilization of fly ash with silica fume and properties of Portland cement-fly ash-silica fume concrete. Fuel, 89(3), 768-774. https://doi. org /10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.003.
Pacheco-Torgal, F., Abdollahnejad, Z., Camões, A.F., Jamshidi, M. & Ding, Y. (2012). Durability of alkali- activated binders: a clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue?. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 400- 405. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2011.12.017.
Pan, Z., Sanjayan, J.G. & Rangan, B.V. (2009). An investigation of the mechanisms for strength gain or loss of geopolymer mortar after exposure to elevated temperature. Journal of Materials Science, 44(7), 1873-1880. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10853-009-3243-z.
Papa, E., Medri, V., Benito, P., Vaccari, A., Bugani, S., Jaroszewicz, J. & Landi, E. (2015). Synthesis of porous hierarchical geopolymer monoliths by ice-templating. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 215, 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.micromeso.2015.05.043.
Provis, J. L., Palomo, A. & Shi, C. (2015). Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 78, 110- 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cemconres.2015.04.013.
Rashad, A.M. (2013). Alkali-activated metakaolin: A short guide for civil Engineer-An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 41, 751- 765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2012.12.030.
Rashidian-Dezfouli, H. & Rangaraju, P.R. (2017). A comparative study on the durability of geopolymers produced with ground glass fiber, fly ash, and glass-powder in sodium sulfate solution. Construction and Building Materials, 153, 996- 1009. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j. conbuildmat.2017.07.139.
Thokchom, S., Dutta, D. & Ghosh, S. (2011). Effect of incorporating silica fume in fly ash geopolymers. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 5(12), 750-754. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/ zenodo.1085832.
Vishwakarma, V., Ramachandran, D., Anbarasan, N. & Rabel, A.M. (2016). Studies of rice husk ash nanoparticles on the mechanical and microstructural properties of the concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 3(6), 1999-2007. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.102
Yip, C.K., Lukey, G.C., Provis, J.L. & Van Deventer, J.S. (2008). Effect of calcium silicate sources on geopolymerisation. Cement and Concrete Research, 38(4), 554-564.