Review Process Policy

         This journal operates Double-Blind Peer Review. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of three independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. Editors are not involved in decisions about papers which they have written themselves or have been written by family members or colleagues or which relate to products or services in which the editor has an interest. Any such submission is subject to all of the journal's usual procedures, with peer review handled independently of the relevant editor and their research groups.

Review Policy

The Managing Editor and Editors have the right to decline formal review of a manuscript when it is deemed that the manuscript

1. is on a topic outside the scope of the Journal;
2. makes no contribution to the advancement of the Food, Agricultural Science, and Technology
3. lacking technical or scientific merit                                                                                             
4. lacks of novelty                                                                                                                 
5. is poorly written