Regeneration of Soil Fertility in Relationship with the Diversification of Rubber Agroforestry Systems
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Rubber agroforestry is an agricultural system that integrates rubber trees with other compatible crops or trees to optimize land use, improve soil fertility, and enhance biodiversity. This study compares the soil richness of Rubber Agroforestry (RF) plantations with varying species diversity and Rubber Monoculture (RM) plantations. The research was conducted in Phatthalung Province, Thailand, a region with a long history of rubber agroforestry, though some areas are cultivated as rubber monocultures. Soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths and analyzed for physical characteristics, organic matter content, and nutrient composition. The findings indicate that soil quality is influenced by plantation type, soil depth, and locality. RM and RF plantations exhibit differences in soil physical properties, cation exchange capacity (CEC), organic carbon (OM), total nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium content. Across all parameters studied, except phosphorus, RF plantations demonstrated higher soil fertility indicators than RM plantations. Additionally, the NDVI analysis from 2017 to 2023 showed that RF plantations had a plant cover of 63%, compared to 58% in RM plantations. The higher plant density in RF plantations contributed to organic matter accumulation, thereby enhancing soil fertility. Conclusion: The study highlights that rubber agroforestry practices contribute to increased soil nutrient levels and organic matter content, underscoring their potential benefits for sustainable land management.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Tongkaemkaew, U.; Penot, E.; Chambon, B. Rubber agroforestry systems in mature plantations in Phatthalung Province, Southern Thailand. Thaksin J. 2020, 23, 78-85.
Tongkaemkaew, U.; Sukkul, J.; Sumkhan, N.; Pangklang, P.; Brauman, A.; Ismail, R. Litterfall, litter decomposition, soil macrofauna, and nutrient contents in rubber monoculture and rubber-based agroforestry plantations. For. Soc. 2018, 2, 138-149. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v2i2.4431
Warren‐Thomas, E.; Nelson, L.; Juthong, W.; Bumrungsri, S.; Brattström, O.; Stroesser, L.; Chambon, B.; Penot, E.; Tongkaemkaew, U.; Edwards, D.P.; et al. Rubber agroforestry in Thailand provides some biodiversity benefits without reducing yields. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 57, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13530
Maria Wang, M.H.; Warren-Thomas, E.; Cherico Wanger, T. Rubber agroforestry: feasibility at scale. Mighty Earth 2021. Available online: https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/files/40328214/Mighty_Earth_Agroforestry_Rubber_Report_May_2021.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2024).
Huang, I.Y.; James, K.; Thamthanakoon, N.; Pinitjitsamut, P.; Rattanamanee, N.; Pinitjitsamut, M.; Yamklin, S.; Lowenberg‑DeBoer, J. Economic outcomes of rubber‑based agroforestry systems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Agrofor. Syst. 2023, 97, 335-354. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10457-022-00734-x
Zhu, X.; Yuan, X.; Lu, E.; Yang, B.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Singh, A.K.; Liu, W. Soil splash erosion: An overlooked issue for sustainable rubber plantation in the tropical region of China. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2023, 11, 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.05.005
Wu, X.; Lyu, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, B.; Zeng, X.; Wu, J.; Sun, Y. Transport of polystyrene nanoplastics in natural soils: Effect of soil properties, ionic strength and cation type. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 136065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136065
Silvianingsih, Y.A.; Hairiah, K.; Suprayogo, D.; Van Noordwijk, M. Kaleka agroforest in Central Kalimantan (Indonesia): soil quality, hydrological protection of adjacent peatlands, and sustainability. Land 2021, 10, 8856. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080856
OAE (Office of Agriculture Economics). Agricultural statistics of Thailand 2022; Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives: Bangkok, Thailand, 2023. (In Thai)
Verhofste, R.; Dunteman, L.; Commons, M.; Kristiansen, O.; Tongkaemkaew, U. Rubber management systems: A progression from extractive to regenerative production. ASEAN J. Sci. Technol. Rep. 2024, 27, e250789. https://doi.org/10.55164/ajstr.v27i3.250789
Pretorius, M.L.; Van Huyssteen, C.W.; Brown, L.R. Soil color indicates carbon and wetlands: Developing a color-proxy for soil organic carbon and wetland boundaries on sandy coastal plains in South Africa. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-017-6249-Z
Rousseau, G.X.; Deheuvels, O.; Rodriguez Arias, I.; Somarriba, E. Indicating soil quality in cacao-based agroforestry systems and old-growth forests: The potential of soil macrofauna assemblage. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 535-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.008
An, Z.; Pokharel, P.; Plante, A.F.; Bork, E.W.; Carlyle, C.N.; Williams, E.K.; Chang, S.X. Soil organic matter stability in forest and cropland components of two agroforestry systems in western Canada. Geoderma 2023, 433, 116463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116463
Yuan, X.; Yang, B.; Liu, W.; Wu, J.; Li, X. Intercropping with cash crops promotes sustainability of rubber agroforestry: Insights from litterfall production and associated carbon and nutrient fluxes. Eur. J. Agron. 2024, 154, 127071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.127071
Hartoyo, A.P.P.; Sunkar, A.; Ramadani, R.; Faluthi, S.H. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) analysis for vegetation cover in Leuser Ecosystem area, Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2021, 22, 1160-1171. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220311
Malik, A.D.; Nasrudin, A.; Parikesit; Withaningsih, S. Vegetation stands biomass and carbon stock estimation using NDVI - Landsat 8 Imagery in Mixed Garden of Rancakalong, Sumedang, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1211, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1211/1/012015
Mey, C.B.J.; Gore, M.L. Biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems of the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2021, 37, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2021.37.2.91