Plant-Based Feed and Forage Research for Livestock: A Bibliometric Review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This bibliometric review research analyzes trends related to “Plant-Based Feed and Forage for Livestock,” utilizing research data from 2013 to 2024. Eighty-two (82) English language journal articles indexed in Scopus were utilized as data. This study focuses on publications in agricultural and environmental sciences. The study aimed to identify all keywords, author keywords, authors, and countries related to research on plant-based feed and forage. It was calculated using VOSviewer to determine density, network, and overlay. This highlights the growing importance of sustainable alternative feed. This bibliometric review highlights the role of plant-based feed and forage in contributing to a sustainable livestock production system, supporting Sustainable Development Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) by enhancing food security through resilient and efficient resource feeding strategies. Shifting to resource-intensive conventional feeds that are environmentally friendly alternatives contributes to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Additionally, reducing greenhouse gas emissions through adaptation of plant-based feed for livestock production, aligned with SGD 13 (Climate Action), and promoting land use practices that reduce deforestation and preserve biodiversity, supports SDG 15 (Life on Land). Mapping the co-citation network and overlaying this research topic provides insights into the development and dissemination of new knowledge in agriculture. Analysis identifies emerging trends and gaps in current research, suggesting areas for future investigation. Overall, this bibliometric review provides a comprehensive overview of the diverse research landscape on plant-based feed and forage for livestock production, specifically for ruminant animals, in temperate and tropical regions. It emphasizes alignment between this research and sustainable goals.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Dey, B.; Notenbaert, A.; Makkar, H.; Mwendia, S.; Rao, I. Realizing Economic and Environmental Gains from Forage Alternatives. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2022, 10.
Milne, E.; Cerri, C. E. P.; Carvalho, J. L. N. Agricultural Expansion in the Brazilian State of Mato Grosso; Implications for C Stocks and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In Environmental Science and Engineering; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010; pp 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00493-3_21
Kibria, M. G.; Aspy, N. N.; Ullah, E.; Dewan, M. F.; Hasan, M. A.; Hossain, M. A.; Haseeb, M.; Hossain, M. E. Quantifying the Effect of Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Food Production Index, and Land Use on Cereal Production in South Asia. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 432, 139764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139764
Hillier, J.; Walter, C.; Malin, D.; Garcia-Suarez, T.; Mila-i-Canals, L.; Smith, P. A Farm-Focused Calculator for Emissions from Crop and Livestock Production. Environ. Model. Softw. 2011, 26(9), 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014
Bo, P. T.; Bai, Y.; Dong, Y.; Shi, H.; Soe Htet, M. N.; Samoon, H. A.; Zhang, R.; Tanveer, S. K.; Hai, J. Influence of Different Harvesting Stages and Cereals–Legume Mixture on Forage Biomass Yield, Nutritional Compositions, and Quality under Loess Plateau Region. Plants 2022, 11(20), 2801. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202801
Lebeloane, M. M.; Famuyide, I. M.; Elgorashi, E. E.; McGaw, L. J.; Kgosana, K. G. Evaluation of Minerals, Trace Elements, and Antinutritional Factors in Selected Legume Fodder Species (Fabaceae) with the Potential to Improve Cattle Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Health. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 171, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.05.051
Bo, P. T.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, R.; Htet, M. N. S.; Hai, J. Optimization of Alfalfa-Based Mixed Cropping with Winter Wheat and Ryegrass in Terms of Forage Yield and Quality Traits. Plants 2022, 11(13), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131752
Kunelius, H. T.; Dürr, G. H.; McRae, K. B.; Fillmore, S. A. E. Performance of Timothy-Based Grass/Legume Mixtures in Cold Winter Region. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2006, 192(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00195.x
Lindström, B. E. M.; Frankow-Lindberg, B. E.; Dahlin, A. S.; Wivstad, M.; Watson, C. A. Micronutrient Concentrations in Common and Novel Forage Species and Varieties Grown on Two Contrasting Soils. Grass Forage Sci. 2013, 68(3), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12006
Jonker, A.; Yu, P. The Occurrence, Biosynthesis, and Molecular Structure of Proanthocyanidins and Their Effects on Legume Forage Protein Precipitation, Digestion and Absorption in the Ruminant Digestive Tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(5), 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051105
Lagrange, S. P.; Macadam, J. W.; Villalba, J. J. The Use of Temperate Tannin Containing Forage Legumes to Improve Sustainability in Forage–Livestock Production. Agronomy 2021, 11(11), 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112264
Acar, R.; Koç, N.; Sumiahadi, A. Investigation of Yield, Yield Components, and Nitrogen-Fixing Ability of Wild Rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) as a Forage Crop in Turkey. Arab. J. Geosci. 2019, 12(23), 740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4959-y
Attia, Y. A.; El-Hack, M. E. A.; Alagawany, M. M.; Elnaggar, A. S. Phytogenic and Phytochemical as Alternative Feed Additives for Animal Production; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, UAE, 2025; pp 1–198. https://doi.org/10.2174/97898153227671250101
Grundy, M. M. L.; Tang, J.; van Milgen, J.; Renaudeau, D. Cell Wall of Feeds and Their Impact on Protein Digestibility: An In Vitro Method Applied for Pig Nutrition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2022, 293, 115467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115467
Georganas, A.; Giamouri, E.; Christodoulou, C.; Mavrommatis, A.; Zoidis, E.; Papadomichelakis, G.; Simitzis, P. E.; Tsiplakou, E.; Pappas, A. C.; Fegeros, K. Impact of Bioactive Compounds on Animals and the Environment. In Bioactive Compounds and Their Importance; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, UAE, 2021; pp 61–103.
Guil-Guerrero, J. L.; Ramos, L.; Moreno, C.; Zúñiga-Paredes, J. C.; Carlosama-Yépez, M.; Ruales, P. Plant-Food By-Products to Improve Farm-Animal Health. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 220, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.016
Wallace, R. J.; Oleszek, W.; Franz, C.; Hahn, I.; Baser, K. H. C.; Mathe, A.; Teichmann, K. Dietary Plant Bioactives for Poultry Health and Productivity. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010, 51(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.506908
Attia, Y. A.; Addeo, N. F.; Bovera, F.; Al-Hack, M. E. A.; AlBanoby, M. A.; Alhotan, R. A.; Khafaga, A. F.; Hafez, H. M.; de Oliveira, M. C. Phytogenic Substances as Novel Feed Supplements and Their Application in Livestock Nutrition. In Phytogenic and Phytochemical as Alternative Feed Additives for Animal Production; Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah, UAE, 2025; pp 4–18. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815322767125010005
Jiang, C.; You, Y.; Lai, X.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, W.; Ma, L. Maximizing Food Equivalent Unit Yield for Forage Crops. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 218, 118942.
Mahmah, S.; Mebarkia, A.; Rekik, F. A Comparative Study on Narbon Vetch and Common Vetch. J. Agric. Sci. (Belgrade) 2023, 68(3), 263–270.
Van Wagenberg, C. P. A.; De Haas, Y.; Hogeveen, H.; Van Krimpen, M. M.; Meuwissen, M. P. M.; Van Middelaar, C. E.; Rodenburg, T. B. Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing Conventional and Organic Livestock Production Systems on Different Aspects of Sustainability. Animal 2017, 11(10), 1839–1851.
Espinoza-Villavicencio, J. L.; Palacios-Espinosa, A.; Ávila-Serrano, N.; Guillén-Trujillo, A.; De Luna-De La Peña, R.; Ortega-Pérez, R.; Murillo-Amador, B. Organic Livestock, an Alternative of Cattle Development for Some Regions of Mexico: A Review. Interciencia 2007, 32(6). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-35648991439
Kumar, R.; Yadav, M. R.; Arif, M.; Mahala, D. M.; Kumar, D.; Ghasal, P. C.; Yadav, K. C.; Verma, R. K. Multiple Agroecosystem Services of Forage Legumes towards Agriculture Sustainability: An Overview. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 90(8), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105882
Scialabba, N. E.-H. Livestock and Future Food Supply Scenarios. In Managing Healthy Livestock Production and Consumption; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, 2021; pp 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823019-0.00011-8
van Huis, A.; Gasco, L. Insects as Feed for Livestock Production: Insect Farming for Livestock Feed Has the Potential to Replace Conventional Feed. Science 2023, 379(6628), 138–139. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adc9165
Govoni, C.; Chiarelli, D. D.; Rulli, M. C. A Global Dataset of the National Green and Blue Water Footprint of Livestock Feeds. Sci. Data 2024, 11(1), 1419. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04264-2
Duan, C.; Yu, C.; Shi, P.; Huangqing, D.; Zhang, X.; Dai, E. Assessing Trade-Offs Among Productive, Economic, and Environmental Indicators of Forage Systems in Southern Tibetan Crop-Livestock Integration. 2023.
Chand, S.; Indu; Singhal, R. K.; Govindasamy, P. Agronomical and Breeding Approaches to Improve the Nutritional Status of Forage Crops for Better Livestock Productivity. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12557
MacLeod, N.; Waldron, S.; Wen, S.-L. A Comprehensive Approach for Assessing the Economic Contribution of Forage and Livestock Improvement Options to Smallholder Farming Enterprises. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61091-7
Mbambalala, L.; Rani, Z. T.; Mpanza, T. D. E.; Mthana, M. S.; Ncisana, L.; Mkhize, N. R. Fodder Radish as a Potential Alternative Feed Source for Livestock in South Africa. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081625
Ates, S.; Cicek, H.; Bell, L. W.; Norman, H. C.; Mayberry, D. E.; Kassam, S.; Hannaway, D. B.; Louhaichi, M. Sustainable Development of Smallholder Crop-Livestock Farming in Developing Countries. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/142/1/012076
Rao, I.; Peters, M.; Castro, A.; et al. LivestockPlus – The Sustainable Intensification of Forage-Based Agricultural Systems to Improve Livelihoods and Ecosystem Services in the Tropics. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(3)59-82
Maass, B. L.; Pengelly, B. C. Tropical and Subtropical Forage Germplasm Conservation and Science on Their Deathbed! 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019867961
Paul, B. K.; Groot, J. C. J.; Maass, B. L.; Notenbaert, A. M. O.; Herrero, M.; Tittonell, P. A. Improved Feeding and Forages at a Crossroads: Farming Systems Approaches for Sustainable Livestock Development in East Africa. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020906170
Paul, B. K.; Koge, J.; Maass, B. L.; Notenbaert, A.; Peters, M.; Groot, J. C. J.; Tittonell, P. Tropical Forage Technologies Can Deliver Multiple Benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa. A Meta-Analysis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00626-3
Ginwal, D. S.; Kumar, R.; Ram, H.; Meena, R. K.; Kumar, U. Quality Characteristics and Nutrient Yields of Maize and Legume Forages under Changing Intercropping Row Ratios. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 89(3), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.56093/IJANS.V89I3.88079
