Process Capability Assessment Using SPC and Cpk in the Analysis of Clay Soil Atterberg Limits: A Case Study in Pathum Thani Province

Main Article Content

Pattaraporn Nueasri
รัตนโชติ ทองป้อง

บทคัดย่อ

This study evaluated the consistency and capability of the testing process for the Plasticity Index (PI) of fine-grained soils, a parameter critical for soil classification and geotechnical design, particularly in compaction and foundation analyses. Statistical Process Control (SPC) was applied using X–MR control charts to monitor process stability, while process capability was assessed through Cp and Cpk indices under specification limits of LSL = 2.00 and USL = 10.00. Trend analysis and uncertainty evaluation were also conducted to strengthen the assessment framework. Results showed that the PI testing process was statistically stable, with all data points within control limits. However, process capability indices (Cp = 0.702, Cpk = 0.616) were below the benchmark value of 1.33, indicating insufficient performance due to inherent variability. Linear regression revealed no significant time-related trend (R² = 0.1%, p = 0.864), confirming temporal consistency. Uncertainty analysis yielded an expanded uncertainty of ±0.537 at 95% confidence, equivalent to 9.7% of the mean PI. Such uncertainty suggests possible misclassification of results near specification thresholds. In conclusion, although the PI testing process was under statistical control and free of time-related drift, it exhibited substantial variability and high uncertainty. These findings emphasize the need to reduce variation and incorporate uncertainty into quality management practices, providing a more reliable basis for decision-making in geotechnical engineering applications.

Article Details

ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

ASTM D4318-17. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.

Hasan, M. F.; Abuel-Naga, H. Determining Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of Clay Soils by Electrical Surface Conduction and Diffuse Double Layer Thickness. Minerals 2024, 143), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14030210

Marušić, D.; Jagodnik, V. Determination of the Atterberg Limits Using a Fall Cone Device on Low Plasticity Silty Sands. Min. Geol. Pet. Eng. Bull. 2023, 38(3), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2023.3.11

Rosas, D. A.; Burgos, D.; Branch, J. W.; Corbi, A. Automatic Determination of the Atterberg Limits with Machine Learning. DYNA 2022, 89(224), 102619. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v89n224.102619

Knadel, M.; Rehman, H. U.; Pouladi, N.; de Jonge, L. W.; Moldrup, P.; Arthur, E. Estimating Atterberg Limits of Soils from Reflectance Spectroscopy and Pedotransfer Functions. Geoderma 2021, 402, 115300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115300

Phoon, K. K.; Kulhawy, F. H. Characterization of Geotechnical Variability. Can. Geotech. J. 1999, 36(4), 612–624.

Abdallah, A.; Russo, G.; Cuisinier, O. Statistical and Predictive Analyses of the Strength Development of a Cement-Treated Clayey Soil. Geotechnics 2023, 3(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics3020026

Alsharari, N.; Olenko, A.; Abuel-Naga, H. Modeling of Electrical Resistivity of Soil Based on Geotechnical Properties. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1911.06501. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.06501

Weber, P.; Knadel, M.; Arthur, E. Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Rapid Estimation of Soil Atterberg Limits. Geoderma 2018, 361, 114083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.018

Bhavya, K.; Nagaraj, T. Influence of Soil Structure and Clay Mineralogy on Atterberg Limits. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 11292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98729-y

Prasanna, H. S.; Harshitha, D. Correlation of Compaction Characteristics of Fine-Grained Soils Using Atterberg Limits. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2017, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV6IS060051

Ayodele, A. L.; Pamukcu, S.; Agbede, O. A. Plasticity Modification of a Tropical Laterite by Electrochemical Stabilization. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 341, 136047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136047

Holtz, R. D.; Kovacs, W. D.; Sheahan, T. C. An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2011.

Das, B. M.; Sobhan, K. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 8th ed., SI Version; Cengage Learning: Stamford, CT, 2014.

Karakan. Comparative Analysis of Atterberg Limits, Liquidity Index, Flow Index, and Undrained Shear Strength in Binary Clay Mixtures. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8616. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178616

Dehghanian, K.; İpek, S. Ö. A Survey on the Relationships between Compression Index, Coefficient of Consolidation, and Atterberg Limits. J. Sustain. Constr. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1161504

Abdallah, A.; Russo, G.; Cuisinier, O. Statistical and Predictive Analyses of the Strength Development of a Cement-Treated Clayey Soil. Geotechnics 2023, 3(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics3020026

Montgomery, D. C. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 7th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019.

Terzaghi, K.; Peck, R. B.; Mesri, G. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 1996.

Saied, E.; Besees, A. Y.; Wazeer, A.; Abd-Eltwab, A. A. Process Performance Analysis in Cement Industry. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9(6), 844–860.