Detection and Measurement of Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances in a Protected Area Using the Rasch Model
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the extent of major threats in the 244.13-hectare Tugbo Natural Biotic Area (TNBA) on Masbate Island, Philippines. Threat-focused patrolling has covered the entire continuum, with a specified recording interval along the protected area (PA), divided into numerous patrol routes. Categorized into human-induced and natural calamities, a total of 27 individual threats were geo-tagged and recorded, with mixed perennial farming as the most frequent threat. Using geo-spatial technologies, the risks were reduced to 10, largely represented by broad expanses of rangelands and invasive monocrop plantations. This paper presents a new methodology for measuring and visualizing threats to protected areas based on the Rasch model. This probabilistic analysis is based on the presence or absence of the threat in each location, disturbance estimates, and the calculation of misfits. The visualization map illustrates that the protected area had an unequal distribution of threats. Most locations have less disturbed areas; hence, the data indicate that the protected area is nearly pristine. This approach is a useful methodology for assessing in-depth environmental disturbance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Solaimani, K.; Darvishi, S. Comparative Analysis of Land Use Changes Modeling Based-on New Hybrid Models and CA-Markov in the Urmia Lake Basin. Adv. Space Res. 2024, 74(8), 3749–3764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.078
Roy, P. S.; Ramachandran, R. M.; Paul, O.; Thakur, P. K.; Ravan, S.; Behera, M. D.; Kanawade, V. P. Anthropogenic Land Use and Land Cover Changes—A Review on Its Environmental Consequences and Climate Change. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2022, 50(8), 1615–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-022-01569-w
Nyathi, N. A.; Musakwa, W.; Krenz, J.; Kuhn, N. J. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Habitat Quality Explored with InVEST: The Case of the Greater Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Sustain. Environ. 2025, 11(1), 2520642. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2520642
Batool, S.; et al. Nature’s Comeback: Case Studies of South Asian Countries Regarding Biodiversity Restoration and Conservation. In Sustainable Synergy: Harnessing Ecosystems for Climate Resilience; Choudhury, M., Dixit, G., Majumdar, S., Eds.; Climate Change Management; Springer: Cham, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77957-2_5
Pulido-Chadid, K.; Virtanen, E.; Geldmann, J. How Effective Are Protected Areas for Reducing Threats to Biodiversity? A Systematic Review Protocol. Environ. Evid. 2023, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-023-00311-4
Meng, Z.; Dong, J.; Ellis, E. C.; Metternicht, G.; Qin, Y.; Song, X.-P.; Löfqvist, S.; Garrett, R. D.; Jia, X.; Xiao, X. Post-2020 Biodiversity Framework Challenged by Cropland Expansion in Protected Areas. Nat. Sustain. 2023, 6(7), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01093-w
Girma, R.; Fürst, C.; Moges, A. Land Use Land Cover Change Modeling by Integrating Artificial Neural Network with Cellular Automata-Markov Chain Model in Gidabo River Basin, Main Ethiopian Rift. Environ. Chall. 2022, 6, 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100419
Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Gou, A. Habitat Quality Evolution Characteristics and Multi-Scenario Prediction in Shenzhen Based on PLUS and InVEST Models. Front. Earth Sci. 2023, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1146347
Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Bi, L. Spatial and Temporal Changes of Habitat Quality and Its Influential Factors in China Based on the InVEST Model. Forests 2023, 14(2), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020374
Sun, J.; Ongsomwang, S. Optimal Parameters of Random Forest for Land Cover Classification with Suitable Data Type and Dataset on Google Earth Engine. Front. Earth Sci. (Lausanne) 2023, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1188093
Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, S.; Li, Y. Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis of Land Use Impacts on Habitat Quality in Tianjin Based on the PLUS Model Coupled with the InVEST Model. Sustainability 2022, 14(11), 6923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116923
Admasu, S.; Yeshitela, K.; Argaw, M.; Bloor, M. Assessing Habitat Quality Using the InVEST Model in the Dire and Legedadi Watersheds, Central Highland of Ethiopia: Implication for Watershed Management. Sustain. Environ. 2023, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2242137
Nematollahi, S.; Fakheran, S.; Kienast, F.; Jafari, A. Application of InVEST Habitat Quality Module in Spatially Vulnerability Assessment of Natural Habitats (Case Study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08460-6
Tahir, Z.; Haseeb, M.; Mahmood, S. A.; Batool, S.; Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M.; Ullah, S.; Tariq, A. Predicting Land Use and Land Cover Changes for Sustainable Land Management Using CA-Markov Modelling and GIS Techniques. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15(1), 3271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87796-w
Dos Santos, W. P.; Acuña-Guzman, S. F.; de Oliveira, P. T.; Beniaich, A.; Cardoso, D. P.; Silva, M. L.; Avanzi, J. C. CA-Markov Prediction Modeling for the Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Change in Two Sub-Basins of the Tocantins-Araguaia River Basin. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2024, 196(6), 499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12673-4
Hakim, A. M. Y.; Santosa, B. H.; Martono, D. N.; Sencaki, D. B.; Prayogi, H.; Arifandri, R.; Steinhausen, M. J. Exploring Land Cover Change Impacts on Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning Technique and Scenario Simulation: Case Study of the Upper Citarum River Basin, Indonesia. Mod. Earth Syst. Environ. 2025, 11(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-025-02352-9
Blissag, B.; Yebdri, D.; Kessar, C. Spatiotemporal Change Analysis of LULC Using Remote Sensing and CA-ANN Approach in the Hodna Basin, NE of Algeria. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C 2024, 133, 103535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2023.103535
Loyd, B. H.; Hoover, H. D. Vertical Equating Using the Rasch Model. J. Educ. Meas. 1980, 17(3), 179–193.
Rabbitt, M. P. Causal Inference with Latent Variables from the Rasch Model as Outcomes. Measurement 2018, 120, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.044
Moral, F. J.; Terrón, J. M.; Rebollo, F. J. Site-specific Management Zones Based on the Rasch Model and Geostatistical Techniques. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2011, 75(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.10.014
Moral, F. J.; Rebollo, F. J.; Terrón, J. M. Analysis of Soil Fertility and Its Anomalies Using an Objective Model. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2012, 175(6), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201100361
Moral, F. J.; Álvarez, P.; Canito, J. L. Mapping and Hazard Assessment of Atmospheric Pollution in a Medium Sized Urban Area Using the Rasch Model and Geostatistics Techniques. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40(8), 1408–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.054
Moral, F. J.; Rebollo, F. J.; Valiente, P.; López, F. Modeling of Atmospheric Pollution in Urban and Rural Sites Using a Probabilistic and Objective Approach. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(19), 4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194009
Tennant, A.; Conaghan, P. G. The Rasch Measurement Model in Rheumatology: What Is It and Why Use It? When Should It Be Applied, and What Should One Look for in a Rasch Paper? Arthritis Care Res. 2007, 57(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108
Forest Management Bureau. Top 10 Most Deforested Provinces in the Philippines. Philippine Forest Cover. Philstar, March 4, 2018. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/03/04/1793446/recovering-philippines-forest-cover (accessed 2026-02-23).
Estoque, R. C.; Murayama, Y.; Lasco, R. D.; Myint, S. W.; Pulhin, F. B.; Wang, C.; Hijioka, Y. Changes in the Landscape Pattern of the La Mesa Watershed—The Last Ecological Frontier of Metro Manila, Philippines. For. Ecol. Manage. 2018, 430, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.023
Regional Soils Laboratory. Soil Test Result Interpretation; Integrated Laboratory Division, DA-RFU ROV: Naga City, Philippines, 2019.
Forest Management Bureau. LAWIN Forest and Biodiversity Protection System. Module 2: Purpose-driven Patrolling; Forest Conservation Area Planning: 2018. http://pdf.usaid.gov (accessed 2026-02-23).
National Mapping and Resource Information Authority. Land Cover Map of Tugbo Watershed Forest Reserve, Province of Masbate; Land Mapping Division: Legaspi City, Philippines, 2019.
Mair, P.; Hatzinger, R. CML Based Estimation of Extended Rasch Models with the eRm Package in R. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 49(1), 26–43.
Provincial Environment and Natural Resources – Community Environment and Natural Resources Office. Socio-economic Assessment Monitoring System (SEAMS). Tugbo Watershed Forest Reserve; Masbate City, Philippines, 2018.
Bond, T. G.; Fox, C. M. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 3rd ed.; Routledge: New York, 2015.
Boone, W. J.; Staver, J. R.; Yale, M. S. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences; Springer: Dordrecht, 2014.
Tsai, C. L.; Wind, S.; Estrada, S. Exploring the Effects of Collapsing Rating Scale Categories in Polytomous Item Response Theory Analyses: An Illustration and Simulation Study. Meas.: Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 2025, 23(1), 66–89.
Quan, Y.; Wang, C. Collapsing or Not? A Practical Guide to Handling Sparse Responses for Polytomous Items. Methodology 2025, 21(1), 46–73.
Linacre, J. M. Winsteps Rasch Measurement Computer Program User’s Guide, Version 5.1.1; Winsteps.com: 2021.
Linacre, J. M. What Do Infit and Outfit, Mean-Square and Standardized Mean. Rasch Meas. Trans. 2002, 16(2), 878.
Lee, Y. W. Examining Passage-related Local Item Dependence (LID) and Measurement Construct Using Q3 Statistics in an EFL Reading Comprehension Test. Lang. Test. 2004, 21(1), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt260oa
Mair, P.; Hatzinger, R. CML-based Estimation of Extended Rasch Models with the eRm Package in R. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 49(1), 26–43.
