Logistical Packaging Evaluation in Automotive Supply Chains: A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach with Industry Evidence
Main Article Content
Abstract
The selection of packaging containers is a critical component of the global automotive industry’s logistics strategy, influencing operational efficiency and environmental sustainability. This study proposes a multicriteria decision-making approach using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to evaluate packaging container alternatives for knock-down parts logistics. A key contribution of the study is the development of practical evaluation criteria derived from expert interviews, structured into five key dimensions. Evaluations were conducted in two stages: company-wide and origin–destination specific. Survey data from six Japanese automotive companies were analyzed using a unified group approach to ensure consistency. The importance of the evaluation criteria across companies was compared using the results to identify preferred container alternatives under each scenario. Additionally, actual container usage data were compared with the model outcomes to validate the findings. The analysis revealed diverse corporate strategies and highlighted the gap between model-based rational choices and real-world practices. Notably, many firms adopt returnable containers at levels exceeding model recommendations. For outer packaging, the actual returnable-to-one-way ratio exceeded the model-based ratio for five out of six companies, with differences ranging, suggesting that environmental initiatives, such as promoting reusable assets, play a central role in decision-making. The proposed model is a structured, practical tool to support container selection decisions, providing insights into the trade-offs among logistics performance, environmental goals, and operational realities.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Rubert, C. K.; De Carvalho, C. P.; De Almeida, M. da G. D.; De Barros, J. G. M.; Sampaio, N. A. de S. Development of automotive packaging by applying the QFD method. Rev. Gest. Secret. 2023, 14(6), 10527–10548. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i6.2391
Coelho, P. M.; Corona, B.; Klooster, R.; Worrell, E. Sustainability of reusable packaging—Current situation and trends. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. X 2020, 6, 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100037
Taherdoost, H.; Madanchian, M. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia 2023, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
Tarnanidis, T.; Papathanasiou, J.; Mareschal, B.; Vlachopoulou, M. MCDM review in marketing and managerial decisions: Practical implications and future research. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2025, 15(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2024.3.004
Momena, A. F.; Gazi, K. H.; Rahaman, M.; Sobczak, A.; Salahshour, S.; Mondal, S. P.; Ghosh, A. Ranking and challenges of supply chain companies using MCDM methodology. Logistics 2024, 8(3), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030087
Moktadir, M. A.; Paul, S. K.; Bai, C.; Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. R. The current and future states of MCDM methods in sustainable supply chain risk assessment. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 27(3), 7435–7480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04200-1
Wang, C.-N.; Le, T. Q.; Chang, K.-H.; Dang, T.-T. Measuring road transport sustainability using MCDM-based entropy objective weighting method. Symmetry 2022, 14(5), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14051033
Khan, S.; Khan, M. I.; Haleem, A.; Jami, A. R. Prioritising the risks in Halal food supply chain: An MCDM approach. J. Islam. Mark. 2022, 13(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-10-2018-0206
Twede, D.; Clarke, R. Supply chain issues in reusable packaging. J. Mark. Channels 2004, 12(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J049v12n01_02
Mollenkopf, D.; Closs, D.; Twede, D.; Lee, S.; Burgess, G. Assessing the viability of reusable packaging: A relative cost approach. J. Bus. Logist. 2005, 26(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00198.x
Silva, D. A. L.; Santos Renó, G. W.; Sevegnani, G.; Sevegnani, T. B.; Serra Truzzi, O. M. Comparison of one-way and returnable packaging: A case study of reverse logistics in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 47, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.057
Na, B.; Sim, M. K.; Lee, W. J. An optimal purchase decision of reusable packaging in the automotive industry. Sustainability 2019, 11(23), 6579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236579
Cildoz, M.; Mateo, P. M.; Alonso, M. T.; Parreño, F.; Alvarez-Valdes, R.; Mallor, F. The optimal container selection problem for parts transportation in the automotive sector. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 247, 123321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123321
Pålsson, H.; Finnsgård, C.; Wänström, C. Selection of packaging systems in supply chains from a sustainability perspective: The case of Volvo. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2013, 26(5), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.1979
Škerlič, S.; Muha, R. A model for managing packaging in the product life cycle in the automotive industry. Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229431