Driving Innovation Hybrid Mechanical Engineering Review Platform as Catalysts for Technology Diffusion
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Responding to the imperative of keeping pace with the dynamic nature of technological innovations in the field of mechanical engineering, the integration of e-learning emerges as a promising avenue. The study used a descriptive-analytic method, a survey questionnaire, and the ISO standard model, specifically ISO 25010, and distributed it to 110 randomly selected respondents. The findings indicate a consistently high rating for effectiveness from reviewees, reviewers, and newly qualified board passers. There was strong agreement among them regarding the platform's efficacy across various dimensions, including content design, media design, visual design, feedback mechanisms, and assessment items. The performance expectancy and effort expectancy did not exert a significant influence on the behavioral intention to use the hybrid mechanical engineering review platform.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Prokopenko, O.; Järvis, M.; Bielialov, T.; Omelyanenko, V.; Malheiro, T. The Future of Entrepreneurship: Bridging the Innovation Skills Gap through Digital Learning. In International Conference Innovation in Engineering 2024; 2024; Vol. 206, pp 206–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61582-5_18
Pardillo, M. B. Promoting Unity and Development in Education through Faculty Cooperation in Student Interfaith Dialogue; 2025.
Medio, G. Ecological Balance Program for Guinacot, Danao City, Cebu. J. Harbin Eng. Univ. 2024, 45(11).
Canillo, E. P.; Bendanillo, A. The Centrality of the Learners in the Light of John Dewey's Philosophy of Education. SSRN Electron. J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4722522
Bendanillo, A. Education in Immanuel Kant and John Dewey: A Comparative Analysis. SSRN Electron. J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4249493
Alam, A. Cloud-Based e-Learning: Scaffolding the Environment for Adaptive e-Learning Ecosystem. Comput. Commun. Netw. IoT 2022, 5(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1976-3_1
Dangwal, K. L. Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 2017, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Rahi, S.; Mansour, M. M. O.; Alghizzawi, M.; Alnaser, F. M. Integration of UTAUT Model in Internet Banking Adoption Context. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2019, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032
Zhang, M. Z.; Wang, T. R.; Lyu, P. H.; Chen, Q. M.; Li, Z. X.; Ngai, E. W. Impact of Gender Composition of Academic Teams on Disruptive Output. J. Informetr. 2024, 18(2), 101520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101520
Pham, T. D. T.; Lo, F. Y. Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 186, 122162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122162
Kiefer, K.; Heileman, M.; Pett, T. L. Does Gender Still Matter? Small Bus. Econ. 2022, 58(1), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00403-2
Lauring, J.; Butler, C. L.; Paunova, M.; Uman, T.; Zander, L. Openness towards Language and Cultural Differences. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 2024, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2024.140297
Lewis, E. Best Practices for Improving Online Course Design. J. Contin. High. Educ. 2021, 69(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1776558
Chen, Y. T. The Effect of Video-Based Instruction in e-Learning. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2012, 7(6), 957–965. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS11.1788
Yudhanto, Y.; Pryhatyanto, W. M.; Sulandari, W. Designing UI/UX Using Design Thinking. In Proc. Int. Conf. Smart Technol. Appl. Informatics Eng. (APICS); IEEE: 2022; pp 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/APICS56469.2022.9918684
Jiang, X.; Liu, L.; Wu-Ouyang, B.; Chen, L.; Lin, H. Storytelling Preferences and News Engagement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2024, 158, 108248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108248
Herianto; Wilujeng, I.; Lestari, D. P. Interactive Multimedia e-Books and Student Curiosity. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022, 27 (7), 9619–9639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11005-8
Su, P. Y.; Su, C. H.; Wang, C. M.; Fan, K. K. Media Richness and Technology Acceptance in Learning Apps. J. Internet Technol. 2024, 25(1), 37–49.
https://doi.org/10.53106/160792642024012501004
Samara, T. Making and Breaking the Grid: A Graphic Design Layout Workshop; Rockport Publishers: 2023.
Bhatti, U. A.; Jingbing, L.; Mengxing, H. Deep Learning for Multimedia Processing Applications; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032646268
Gaertner, H. Effects of Student Feedback on Teaching Quality. Stud. Educ. Eval. 2014, 42, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.04.003
Garcia, I.; James, R. W.; Bischof, P.; Baroffio, A. Self-Observation and Peer Feedback in Teaching. Teach. Learn. Med. 2017, 29(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1279056
Gulati, A.; Saini, H.; Singh, S.; Kumar, V. Behavioral Intentions to Adopt ChatGPT. Mark. Educ. Rev. 2024, 34(3), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2023.2300139
Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; Davis, F. D. User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 2003, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Park, E. User Acceptance of Smart Wearable Devices. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 47, 101318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101318
Stoyanova, T.; Markova, M. Digitalization of Education: A Case Study. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2022, 10(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2022.10.1(2)
Moorthy, K.; Chun T'ing, L.; Ming, K. S.; Ping, C. C.; Ping, L. Y.; Joe, L. Q.; Jie, W. Y. Digital Library Adoption. Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 2019, 51 (2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2018.1463049
Mitchell, T. R.; Albright, D. W. Expectancy Theory Predictions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1972, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(72)90033-5
Chen, L.; Rashidin, M. S.; Song, F.; Wang, Y.; Javed, S.; Wang, J. Purchase Intention in e-Commerce. SAGE Open 2021, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211027875
Wan Sulaiman, W. N. A.; Mustafa, S. E. Adoption of Digital Textbooks. Publ. Res. Q. 2020, 36, 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09742-0
Bulur, H. G.; Gönül, M. S. A Quantitative Investigation of Students' Attitudes towards Electronic Book Technology. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 2020, 52(3), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619884114
Izuagbe, R. Faculty Research Performance Expectancy of Online Databases: System Design Characteristics as Facilitating Conditions. J. Acad. Librariansh. 2021, 47(2), 102318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102318
Kolil, V. K.; Achuthan, K. Longitudinal Study of Teacher Acceptance of Mobile Virtual Labs. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28(7), 7763–7796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11499-2
Ogemdi Uchenna, E.; Uzoma Oluchukwu, N. An Appraisal of Students' Adoption of E-Learning Communication Tools: A SEM Analysis. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022, 27(7), 10239–10260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10975-z
Jameel, A. S.; Abdalla, S. N.; Karem, M. A.; Ahmad, A. R. Behavioural Intention to Use E-Learning from Students’ Perspective during COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Inf. Sci. (AiCIS); 2020; pp 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/AiCIS51645.2020.00035
Çeken, B.; Taşkın, N. Multimedia Learning Principles in Different Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. Smart Learn. Environ. 2022, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Abbad, M. Using the UTAUT Model to Understand Students' Usage of E-Learning Systems in Developing Countries. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26(6), 7205–7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
Alanazi, A.; Elias, N. F.; Mohamed, H.; Sahari, N. Exploring Mobile Learning Adoption in Higher Education: A UTAUT2-Based Study with Technostress and Exhaustion as Mediators in Student Engagement. Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031353
Omar, A.; Tiwari, V.; Saad, M. Smart Technology's Potential in Smart Destinations: A Comprehensive UTAUT Model with Privacy and Safety Risk Moderation. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2025, 16(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2024-0061
Koh, J. H. L.; Kan, R. Y. P. Students' Use of Learning Management Systems and Desired E-Learning Experiences: Are They Ready for Next Generation Digital Learning Environments? High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2021, 40(5), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.17999490
El-Sabagh, H. A. Adaptive E-Learning Environment Based on Learning Styles and Its Impact on Development Students' Engagement. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Xue, L.; Rashid, A. M.; Ouyang, S. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. SAGE Open 2024, 14(1), 21582440241229570. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570
Giannakos, M. N.; Mikalef, P.; Pappas, I. O. Systematic Literature Review of E-Learning Capabilities to Enhance Organizational Learning. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 24(2), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10097-2
Wan, Z.; Compeau, D.; Haggerty, N. The Effects of Self-Regulated Learning Processes on E-Learning Outcomes in Organizational Settings. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2012, 29(1), 307–340. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290109
Adyaputra, R.; Imtihan, K.; Saleh, M. Assessing User Satisfaction of Local Government Websites through ISO 25010 and TAM: A SmartPLS and IPMA-Based Study in Lombok Tengah. J. Inf. Organ. Sci. 2025, 49(2), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.31341/jios.49.2.8
Zanjani, N. The Important Elements of LMS Design That Affect User Engagement with E-Learning Tools within LMSs in the Higher Education Sector. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2017, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2938
Almaiah, M. A.; Alfaisal, R.; Salloum, S. A.; Hajjej, F.; Thabit, S.; El-Qirem, F. A.; Al-Maroof, R. S. Examining the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Social and Computer Anxiety in E-Learning Settings: Students' Perceptions at the University Level. Electronics 2022, 11(22), 3662. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223662
Barrett, A.; Pack, A.; Guo, Y.; Wang, N. Technology Acceptance Model and Multi-User Virtual Reality Learning Environments for Chinese Language Education. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2023, 31(3), 1665–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855209
Luo, R. Z.; Zhou, Y. L. The Effectiveness of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Higher Education Blended Learning: A Five-Year Systematic Review. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2024, 40(6), 3005–3029. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13052
Khan, A. A. Assessing Student Learning by Reducing Cognitive Load in Postgraduate Fire Safety Engineering Courses. Discover Education 2025, 4(1), 284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00724-y
Zhang, Q.; Lin, S.; Liu, J. Factors Impacting College Students' Collaborative Learning Intention: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2025, 33(2), 1490–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2372642
Gupta, N.; Ali, K.; Jiang, D.; Fink, T.; Du, X. Beyond Autonomy: Unpacking Self-Regulated and Self-Directed Learning through the Lens of Learner Agency—A Scoping Review. BMC Med. Educ. 2024, 24(1), 1519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06476-x
Abumandour, E. S. T. Applying E-Learning System for Engineering Education—Challenges and Obstacles. J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn. 2022, 15(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2021-0048
Bongabong, M.; Embuscado, F.; Falcone, E.; Vigonte, F. G.; Abante, M. V. Demographics and Assessment of the Computer-Based Licensure Examination (CBLE) of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC): An Input for Funding Proposal. SSRN 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4386027
Sala, R.; Maffei, A.; Pirola, F.; Enoksson, F.; Ljubić, S.; Skoki, A.; Pezzotta, G. Blended Learning in the Engineering Field: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2024, 32(3), e22712. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22712
