Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Production in the Philippines: A System Dynamics Approach
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions from agricultural production, most especially from methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from rice paddies and from excessive use of fertilizers, contribute significantly to global warming. This paper presents a system dynamics (SD) model to forecast agricultural GHG emissions and rice production in the Philippines over a fourteen year time horizon (2026 to 2040) under four different scenarios. These scenarios are: a) the conventional method of irrigation used by farmers today, b) Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) of puddles created during flooded rice cultivation, applied in combination with biochar amendments (AWD & biochar), c) Urea Deep Placement (UDP) which is a precise placement of nitrogen containing fertilizers, and d) mechanization of animal powered tillage (mechanization). The model was validated against independent benchmarks for agricultural emissions with Mean Absolute Percentage Errors (MAPE) ranging from 0.96% to 1.52%. The results obtained from the different scenarios showed that Scenario 2 (AWD & biochar) resulted in the largest average emissions reduction of 25% (range: 23%–27%) and highest average rice yields of 6.81% (range: 5%–8%) over the entire 14-year period compared to the baseline. Scenario 3 (UDP) yielded average emissions reduction of 4.5% (range: 4%–5%) and average increase in rice yields of 5.42% (range: 4%–6%). The fourth scenario or mechanization of animal powered tillage yielded minimal average emissions reduction of 0.2% (range: 0.2%–0.3%) and average increase in rice yields of 0.04% (range: 0%–0.1%). These percent changes in emissions and yield reported in the paper are averages over the entire 14-year period and are computed on an annual basis by comparing each year in the four scenarios with corresponding years in the baseline scenario. Results indicate that two approaches namely AWD with biochar and UDP whether singly or in combination are most feasible near-term options to develop climate smart agriculture or climate smart rice production in the country and are within the country’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Maclean, J. L.; Dawe, D. C.; Hardy, B.; Hettel, G. P. Rice Almanac, 3rd ed.; International Rice Research Institute (IRRI): Los Baños, Philippines, 2002.
[2] Jatmiko, A. R.; Suryani, E.; Octabriyantiningtyas, D. The Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation: A System Thinking Approach (Case Study: East Java). Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 161, 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.204
[3] Vo, T. B. T.; Wassmann, R.; Mai, V. T.; Vu, D. Q.; Bui, T. P. L.; Vu, T. H.; et al. Methane Emission Factors from Vietnamese Rice Production: Pooling Data of 36 Field Sites for Meta-Analysis. Climate 2020, 8(6), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8060074
[4] Sun, S. K.; Song, J. F.; Wang, F. F.; Wu, P. T.; Wang, Y. B. Evaluating the Impacts of Socio-Economic Factors on Regional Grain Virtual Water Flows in China Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 2019, 217, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.042
[5] Chen, Z.; Balasus, N.; Lin, H.; Nesser, H.; Jacob, D. J. African Rice Cultivation Linked to Rising Methane. Nat. Food 2023, 4, 304–313.
[6] Jiménez, J. de la C.; Pedersen, O. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice via Manipulation of Key Root Traits. Rice 2023, 16, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-023-00638-z
[7] Rubin, B. D.; Mayo, F.; Maglasang, R. S. Modeling the Rice Self-Sufficiency in the Philippines: A System Dynamics Approach. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4247739
[8] Bautista, E. G.; Saito, M.; Rastilantie, M. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Production in the Philippines Based on Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis. Agric. Environ. 2005, 13(1), 139–144.
[9] Fischer, G.; Shah, M.; Tubiello, F. N. Socio-Economic and Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture: An Integrated Assessment, 1990–2080. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360(1463), 2067–2083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1744
[10] Kusoncum, C.; Sethanan, K.; Putri, E. P.; Neungmacha, W. Simulation-Based Approaches for Process Improvement of a Sugar Mill Yard Management System. Eng. Appl. Sci. Res. 2018, 45(4), 320–331.
[11] Jagustović, R.; Papachristos, G.; Zougmoré, R. B.; Kotir, J. H.; Kessler, A.; Ouédraogo, M.; et al. Better before Worse Trajectories in Food Systems? An Investigation of Synergies and Trade-Offs through Climate-Smart Agriculture and System Dynamics. Agric. Syst. 2021, 190, 103104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103131
[12] Amiri, A.; Zare, Y.; Jalalimanesh, A.; Sadegheih, A. Food System Sustainability Investigation Using System Dynamics Approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 2020, 277, 124040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124040
[13] Ighravwe, D. E.; Oke, S. A. Managing Finished Goods Inventory-Maintenance Engineering Interaction Subject to Technical Manufacturing Information Complexity Employing an Associated Fuzzy-System Dynamics Approach. Eng. Appl. Sci. Res. 2018, 45(3), 158–172.
[14] Janthawong, Y.; Wattanutchariya, W.; Tippayawong, K. Y. Application of Value Stream Mapping for Analysis and Performance Improvement of Black Glutinous Rice Supply Chain. KKU Eng. J. 2016, 43 (Suppl. 2), 334–337.
[15] Wassmann, R.; Neue, H. U.; Ladha, J. K.; Aulakh, M. S. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice-Wheat Cropping Systems in Asia. Environ. Dev. Sustainability 2004, 6(1–2), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENVI.0000003630.54494.a7
[16] Li, C.; Mosier, A.; Wassmann, R.; Cai, Z.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Y.; et al. Modeling Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice-Based Production Systems: Sensitivity and Upscaling. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2004, 18(1), GB1045. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002045
[17] Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). Agricultural Indicators System (AIS); Philippine Statistics Authority: Manila, Philippines, 2019.
[18] Yagi, K.; Sriphirom, P.; Cha-un, N.; Fusuwankaya, K.; Chidthaisong, A.; Damen, B.; et al. Potential and Promisingness of Technical Options for Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice Cultivation in Southeast Asian Countries. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 66, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2019.1683890
[19] Li, L.; Tian, H.; Zhang, M.; Fan, P.; Ashraf, U.; Liu, H.; et al. Deep Placement of Nitrogen Fertilizer Increases Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency with Fewer Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Mechanical Direct-Seeded Cropping System. Crop J. 2021, 9(6), 1386–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.12.011
[20] Islam, S. M. M.; Gaihre, Y. K.; Shah, A. L.; Singh, U.; Sarkar, M. I. U.; Meisner, C. Effect of Different Nitrogen Management Tools on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Irrigated Rice in Bangladesh. Geoderma 2015, 245–246, 73–80.