Tourists’ Responses to Immersive Technology in Community-Based Tourism: A Stimulus–Organism–Response Model

Main Article Content

Achaporn Kwangsawad
Paingruthai Nusawat
Napharat Chooprai
Aungkana Jattamart

Abstract

Community-based tourism (CBT) has been recognized as an important approach for promoting sustainable tourism, local participation, and community development. However, the role of immersive technology (IMT) in enhancing CBT experiences remains underexplored, particularly how tourists evaluate technology-driven recommendations and respond behaviorally. This study examines the factors influencing tourists’ attitudes and responses to the use of IMT in CBT through the stimulus–organism–response (SOR) model. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in April 2026 with 400 tourists who had experience using IMT within the previous three months. Data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS. The results show that recommendation reliability and recommendation accuracy significantly and positively influence tourists’ attitudes toward using IMT, with recommendation accuracy having the strongest effect. In contrast, experiential graphic design does not significantly affect attitude. Furthermore, attitude toward using IMT significantly influences tourist satisfaction and intention to use IMT, but it does not significantly affect intention toward the destination. These findings confirm attitude as an internal psychological mechanism linking technology-related stimuli with tourists’ behavioral responses. The study contributes to the literature by extending the SOR framework to the IMT-based CBT context. It suggests that IMT development for CBT should prioritize accurate, reliable, and useful information rather than focusing only on visual design or technological novelty.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Jackson, L. A. Community-based tourism: A catalyst for achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals one and eight. Tour. Hosp. 2025, 6, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp6010029

d. Abreu, L. A.; d. C. Walkowski, M.; Perinotto, A. R. C.; d. Fonseca, J. F. Community-based tourism and best practices with the sustainable development goals. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14020036

Dangi, T. B.; Jamal, T. An integrated approach to sustainable community-based tourism. Sustainability 2016, 8, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050475

Scheyvens, R. Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tour. Manage. 1999, 20, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00069-7

Bramwell, B.; Lane, B. Tourism Collaboration and Partnerships: Politics, Practice and Sustainability; Channel View Publications, 2003.

Kwangsawad, A.; Nusawat, P.; Jattamart, A. Immersive storytelling content and innovation resistance in agritourism marketing context: Impact on traveler post-experience behavior. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030165

Sigala, M. Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.015

Gretzel, U.; et al. e-Tourism beyond COVID-19: A call for transformative research. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2020, 22, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00181-3

Durrah, O.; Salem, I. E.; Fathy, E. A.; Fouad, A. M.; Elbaz, A. M.; Hannawi, S. The role of digital technologies in enhancing sustainable community-based tourism: A systematic review of opportunities and challenges. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2026, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-11-2025-1371

Koo, I.; Zaman, U.; Ha, H.; Nawaz, S. Assessing the interplay of trust dynamics, personalization, ethical AI practices, and tourist behavior in the adoption of AI-driven smart tourism technologies. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2025, 11, 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100455

Abou-Shouk, M.; Zouair, N.; Abdelhakim, A.; Roshdy, H.; Abdel-Jalil, M. The effect of immersive technologies on tourist satisfaction and loyalty: The mediating role of customer engagement and customer perceived value. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 36, 3587–3606. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2023-1496

Escandon-Barbosa, D.; Salas-Paramo, J. Technology adoption intention of virtual reality in tourism: Tourist and tourism agencies perspective. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2024, 25, 1028–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2022.2144981

Samaddar, K.; Mondal, S. AR and VR-based travel: A responsible practice towards sustainable tourism. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2024, 10, 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-05-2022-0135

Kwangsawad, A.; Nusawat, P.; Jattamart, A. Conceptual model of innovation decision process and hesitation to adopt augmented reality in tourism industry. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2025, 41, 10569–10594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2434963

Jalil, M. F.; Ali, A.; Meiping, W. Augmented reality adoption and the digital transformation of eco-smart tourism ventures: Exploring the mediating role of tourist engagement. Sci. Rep. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53572-7

Hanafiah, M. H.; Zamzuri, N. H.; Sharif, T. I. S. T.; Chartrungruang, B.-o. Reframing indigenous tourism entrepreneurial personality, experience, sense of community and challenges in community-based tourism-related business. J. Enterprising Communities: People Places Global Econ. 2024, 18, 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-09-2022-0131

Mtapuri, O.; Camilleri, M. A.; Dłużewska, A. Advancing community-based tourism approaches for the sustainable development of destinations. Sustainable Development 2022, 30, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2257

Tan, N. Q.; Ubukata, F.; Dinh, N. C.; Ha, V. H. Rethinking community-based tourism initiatives through community development lens: A case study in Vietnam. Community Dev. 2024, 55, 754–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2024.2344218

Milgram, P.; Kishino, F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 1994, 77, 1321–1329.

Slater, M.; Wilbur, S. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1997, 6, 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603

Hsiao, K.-F.; Chen, N.-S.; Huang, S.-Y. Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2012, 20, 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.486682

Ambika, A.; Shin, H.; Jain, V. Immersive technologies and consumer behavior: A systematic review of two decades of research. Aust. J. Manage. 2025, 50, 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231181429

Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J. A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1974.

Cheng, W.; Tsai, H.; Chuang, H.; Lin, P.; Ho, T. How can emerging event sustainably develop in the tourism industry? From the perspective of the SOR model on a two-year empirical study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310075

Kim, M. J.; Lee, C.-K.; Jung, T. Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. J. Travel Res. 2020, 59, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518818915

Kim, J.-H.; Ritchie, J. B.; McCormick, B. Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. J. Travel Res. 2012, 51, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510385467

Lemon, K. N.; Verhoef, P. C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420

Flavián, C.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S.; Orús, C. The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050

DeLone, W. H.; McLean, E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Wang, R. Y.; Strong, D. M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 1996, 12, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099

Dwivedi, Y. K.; et al. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2022, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542

Kim, S.; Huh, I.; Lee, S. No movie to watch: A design strategy for enhancing content diversity through social recommendation in the subscription-video-on-demand service. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010279

Zheng, L.; Guo, Y.; Peeta, S.; Wu, B. Impacts of information from various sources on the evacuation decision-making process during no-notice evacuations in campus environment. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 2020, 12, 892–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2018.1549643

Arif, Y. M.; et al. Game-based personalized learning in the metaverse computer virtual laboratory: Improving user experience with a learning material recommender system. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2025, 41, 12095–12112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2452215

Wei, L.; et al. Recommendation systems for the metaverse. Blockchains 2023, 1, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains1010003

Gupta, A.; Khan, H. U.; Nazir, S.; Shafiq, M.; Shabaz, M. Metaverse security: Issues, challenges and a viable ZTA model. Electronics 2023, 12, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020391

Wang, J.; Kim, J. U.; Kim, H.-M. Purchase intention in TikTok streaming commerce: The role of recommendation accuracy, streamer's attractiveness, and consumer-to-consumer interactions. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2025, 19, 2255–2278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00810-9

Solano-Barliza, A.; et al. Recommender systems applied to the tourism industry: A literature review. Cogent Bus. Manage. 2024, 11, 2367088. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2367088

Petković, G.; Pasanec Preprotić, S.; Kozjan Cindrić, A. Experiential graphic design: Informing, inspiring, and integrating people in physical spaces—A review. Buildings 2025, 15, 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111862

Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Feng, Z.; Feng, X. Research on the influencing factors of art intervention in the environmental graphics of rural cultural tourism space. Land 2024, 13, 1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101680

Boucherit, S.; Maffei, L.; Masullo, M.; Berkouk, D.; Bouzir, T. A. K. Assessment of sighted and visually impaired users to the physical and perceptual dimensions of an oasis settlement urban park. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15087014

Lloyd-Esenkaya, T.; Lloyd-Esenkaya, V.; O'Neill, E.; Proulx, M. J. Multisensory inclusive design with sensory substitution. Cogn. Res.: Princ. Implic. 2020, 5, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00240-7

Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Liu, Q.; Sutunyarak, C. The impact of immersive technology in museums on visitors' behavioral intention. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229714

Sujood; Pancy. Travelling with open eyes! A study to measure consumers' intention towards experiencing immersive technologies at tourism destinations by using an integrated model of TPB, TAM captured through the lens of SOR. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 36, 3906–3929. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2023-1771

Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Ball, H. L. Conducting online surveys. J. Hum. Lact. 2019, 35, 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419848734

Ringle, C. M. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3. In Computational Data Analysis and Numerical Methods VII WCDANM; Portugal, 2015.

Dash, G.; Paul, J. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092

Hair, J. F., Jr.; Hult, G. T. M.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N. P.; Ray, S. An introduction to structural equation modeling. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook; Springer, 2021; pp 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1

Fornell, C.; Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Henseler, J.; Hubona, G.; Ray, P. A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382