The Design of Visual Communication Barriers and Decoding Perceptions for Standardizing Signage for Deaf Drivers in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The primary objective of this study is to establish a standardized safety framework by evaluating behavioral intent and semantic transparency through a mixed-methods approach. Structuring the study into three systematic phases, a target sample was selected via purposive sampling from the national population of 391,371 registered deaf individuals. The experimental sample comprised 20 participants, bifurcated into two distinct groups: licensed deaf drivers (n = 10) and general motorists (n = 10). Empirical testing was executed using semi-structured interviews in conjunction with a Virtual Reality (VR) driving simulation experiment under dynamic environmental conditions to rigorously measure participants' cognitive latency and reaction times. Crucially, empirical findings reveal that current disability stickers fail as "active safety signals" due to poor chromatic contrast and a lack of ergonomic semiotic linkage. General motorists consistently fail to decode their meaning often perceiving outdated materials as visually obstructive while qualitative insights indicate that a subset of deaf drivers (80.0%, n = 8 out of 10) exhibit a profound psychological reluctance to display static identifiers due to fears of harassment and criminal targeting once their status is publicly marked. To address these systemic failures, the study proposes a standardized visual signaling framework based on ISO 7010 and Universal Design principles. By optimizing chromatic contrast and utilizing situational LED activation, this proposed active system aims to minimize perceptual latency, ensuring critical traffic safety information is decoded instantaneously without compromising the user’s anonymity.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ลิขสิทธ์ ของมหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนครReferences
Department of Land Transport, “Land Transport Act,” [Online]. https://datagov.mot.go.th/dataset. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026]
Annual report 2011, Statistical Data: Traffic Volume and Traffic Accident Data Group,” Department of Highways, 2011.
J. R. Luis, A. C. Alcocer, M. Gertrudix, M. D. C. Gertrudis Casado, P. Giardullo, and D. Wuebben, “Recommendations to improve communication effectiveness in social marketing campaigns: Boosting behavior change to foster a circular economy,” Cogent Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.
G. Adir, N. E. Pascu, V. Adir, and G. Geambasu, “The graphic language of signs, symbols, pictograms in a global world,” Journal of Industrial Design and Engineering Graphics, vol. 19, 2024.
K. Mingsiritham and G. Chanyawudhiwan, “A Study of Using Smart Book to Enhance Communication Ability for Hearing-Impaired Students,” Internation Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 13, no.12, 2018.
S. Ditthapan, “Symbol and Image Design for Public Communication based on Universal Design Principles,” [Online]. https://www.chulapress.com/view.php?id=1285. [Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026]
Department of the Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, “Persons with Disabilities Quality of Life Promotion Act, B.E. 2550 (2007),” [Online].https://songkhla.dop.go.th/th/news/56/215 [Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026].
R. Barthes, Mythologies, A. Lavers, Trans. New York, NY: Hill and Wang, 1972.
S. Tongsiri, “Scaling-up community-based rehabilitation programs in rural Thailand: the development of a capacity building program,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 22, 2022.
S. Hall, “Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms,” Media, Culture & Society, vol. 2, pp. 57–72, 1980.
V. Vorakitphan and N. Pattananukit, “Design symbols to raise awareness of visually impaired persons using haptic floor for safety on roadways,” International Journal of Asia Digital Art and Design Association, vol. 29, no.3, pp. 90-98, 2025. https://doi.org/10.20668/adada.29.3_
L. Shizhu, H. Qiuyu, M. Ziyi, and J. Peanjiang, “A study on the design of a universal signage system for the Ruijin Soviet cultural heritage site,” Heritage Science, vol. 12, no.1, 2024.
Graphical symbols - Safety colours and safety signs - Registered safety signs, ISO 7010:2019, 2019.
G. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen, Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 3rd ed. Routledge, 2021.
R. L. Mace, Universal design: Barrier free environments for everyone, Designers West, 1985.
P. Pimkrajang, “The Study on the Way of Using Online Media of the People with Hearing Loss,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Comm. Arts, Dhurakij Pundit Univ., Bangkok, Thailand, 2017.
C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, 1949.
C. Ware, Visual thinking for design, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2020.
Y. Xu, T. Zhang, B. W. Genter, B. Cai, S. Qi, S. Ma, F. Sun, C. Liao, N. A. Poyakov, G. Vogel, J. L. Lee, and L. Peng, “Redescription and systematics of Oligodon ornatus Van Denburgh, 1909, and two enigmatic related species (Squamata, Colubridae),” Zoosystematics and Evolution, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 315–346, 2026.
Accessible design, 2010 ADA Standards, 2010.
Safety colours and safety signs, International Organization for Standardization. (ISO Standard No. 3864-1:2011), 2011.
Graphical symbols-registered Public information symbols, International Organization for Standardization. (ISO Standard No. 7001:2023), 2023.
Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities. Manual of standard facilities for persons with disabilities and universal design, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. 2012.
Safety colours and safety signs, Thai Industrial Standards Institute. (TIS 635–2554), 2011.