This is an outdated version published on 2026-07-30. Read the most recent version.

Evaluation of using entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae for controlling Musca domestica

Authors

  • Varangrat Pengchaimo Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon Province 47000
  • Anothai Wingsanoi Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Sakon Nakhon Campus, Phangkon, Sakon Nakhon, 47160
  • Jakkapat Prachachit Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon Province 47000
  • Kumpanat Wongkerson Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon Province 47000
  • Nongreudee Ngoipala Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon Province 47000
  • Wirunyupa Ngoipang Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon Province 47000
  • Tina Inthanouhack Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon Province 47000

Keywords:

Metarhizium anisopliae, Musca domestica, control, evaluation

Abstract

Evaluation of the appropriate frequency of using Metarhizium anisopliae for controlling house flies Musca domestica was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD), with each treatment having 5 replications as follows: T1: Control (spraying with water); T2: Spraying M. anisopliae 2 days per week; T3: Spraying M. anisopliae 4 days per week; and T4: Spraying M. anisopliae 6 days per week. In each replication, for larvae aged 4–7 days, there were 30 individuals per box, and for pupae aged 10–20 days, there were 10 pupae per box. At the end of the 264-h experimental period, T2 resulted in the greatest larval mortality, averaging 0.27273 individuals. Statistical analysis revealed that this value was significantly higher than the mortality rates recorded in T3, 4, and 1. Additionally, housefly larvae had the highest pupation rate, averaging 1.8545 individuals in T4, which was not statistically different from T2, T1, and T3, respectively. In the pupal stage, the highest mortality was found in T3, averaging 0.21818 individuals, which was not statistically different from T4, T2, and T1, respectively, and the highest adult emergence was observed in T1, averaging 0.09091 individuals, which was not statistically different from T3, T4, and T2, respectively. This experiment also found that low temperature and high relative humidity affected the evaluation results regarding mortality, low larval pupation, as well as slower pupal development. Therefore, the objective is to evaluate the appropriate frequency of using M. anisopliae to control house fly populations. The results showed that the best frequency for using Metarhizium green fungus to control pupal-stage house fly populations is in T2, spraying M. anisopliae 2 days per week, and the best frequency for controlling house fly populations at the pupa stage is in T3, spraying M. anisopliae 4 days per week.

References

Akom, S. (1995). Medical Entomology (1st ed.). Sammit Printing.

Farooq, M., & S. Freed. 2016. Infectivity of housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to different entomopathogenic fungi. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 47(4), 807-816. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517838216305305

Khare, R.K., Das, G., Kumar, S., Bendigeri, S., Sachan, S., Saiyam, R., Banerjee, D.K., & Khare, D.S. (2019). Herbal insecticides and acaricides: challenges. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 7(4).118-125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334231022_Herbal_insecticides_and_Acaricides_Challenges_and_constraints

LSU AgCenter. (2026). Fly management: Impacts on cattle performance, health and welfare. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/articles/page1772570435269.

National Information Management and Support System. (2023). S1030: Flies impacting livestock, poultry and food safety. https://www.nimss.org/projects/view/mrp/outline/8236

Saleh, A., & Elmosa, H. M. (2002). Toxicities of several insecticides to the house fly (Musca domestica L.) from different regions in Jordan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 18(1), 69–75. https://www.geocities.ws/azzamsal/M.Sc.Thesis.pdf

Sukonthasarn, K., & Sukonthasarn, K.L. (2005). Medically Important Insects in Thailand. Chiang Mai Digital Works.

Thawornthosapan, L., Phawananon, J., & Srirathu, K. (2017). Fumigation effects of peppermint oil, lemon grass oil and kaffir lime oil against housefly, Musca domestica Linnaeus (Diptera: Muscidae). [Undergraduate research project, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Burapha University]. Burapha University Institutional Repository. https://opac1.lib.buu.ac.th/medias3/b00332107/55210076.pdf

Tomorn, C., Penpo, P., Tanruean, K., Napiroon, T., Konkaew, K., Likhitrakarn, N., Torres, J.R.D., & Poolprasert, P. (2019). The potential herbal plant crude extracts as bioinsecticides for controlling Musca domesticaLarvae (Diptera: Mucidae). YRU Journal of Science and Technology, 4(2), 94-103. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/yru_jst/article/view/216647/158562

Wongsorn, D., & Roskrathok, S. (2021). Screening for effective Nakhon Ratchasima province isolates of entomopathogenic fungi for controlling larvae and pupae of housefly (Musca domestica L.). Khon Kaen Agricultural Journal. 50(3), 830–842. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/agkasetkaj/article/view/249396/173629

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Versions

How to Cite

Pengchaimo, V., Wingsanoi , A., Prachachit, J., Wongkerson, K., Ngoipala, N., Ngoipang, W., & Inthanouhack, T. (2026). Evaluation of using entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae for controlling Musca domestica. Journal of Science, Technology and Agriculture Research, 7(2), 128–134. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ScienceRERU/article/view/261769