Determination of Sugarcane Maturity and Optimal Harvest Time via UV-Vis Spectrophotometry and Digital Refractometry

Main Article Content

Yvonne Elizalde
Cherry Mae Pestaño

Abstract

Accurate determination of sugarcane maturity is critical for maximizing sucrose yield and optimizing harvest efficiency; however, field-level assessment in smallholder systems remains largely subjective. This study determined the optimal harvest time for sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivated in Medellin, Cebu, Philippines, using systematic UV-Vis spectrophotometry and digital refractometry across five maturity stages (9-13 months after planting). Juice samples were extracted from three stalk positions (bottom, center, top) of ten randomly selected stalks per stage (n = 150 total). Total soluble solids (°Brix) and UV-Vis absorbance were measured, and data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, Pearson correlation, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and principal component analysis (PCA). The 12-month stage yielded the highest overall mean TSS (19.05 °Bx), the peak UV-Vis absorbance within the optimal range (1.1899 at 600 nm), and the lowest inter-sample variability (SD = 0.076). UV-Vis absorbance values were measured at stage-specific wavelengths (510–620 nm) as an exploratory chromophoric profiling approach; between-stage absorbance values are therefore not directly comparable on a single Beer–Lambert scale and should be interpreted as qualitative maturity indicators only. LDA correctly classified 83.33% of samples (Wilks’ λ, p < 0.05), and PCA confirmed the complementarity of the two methods. Twelve months after planting is recommended as the optimal harvest time, with a practical window of 11 to 12 months. Digital refractometry (≥18 °Bx at the bottom section) and UV-Vis spectrophotometry (absorbance 1.10–1.20 at 600 nm) together provide an accessible, scientifically validated decision-support framework for sugarcane harvest management in the Philippine context.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Sugar Regulatory Administration. Average yield of sugarcane plantation in the Philippines from crop year 2018/19 to 2022/23. Statista 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1480208 (accessed Jan 1, 2024).

Mehdi, S.; Ahmad, M. S.; Iqbal, M.; Mahmood, A. Current perspectives on the regulatory mechanisms of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Heliyon 2024, 10(5), e27277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27277

Mubarak, M.; Niaz, M.; Zia, M. A.; Hussain, I. Post-harvest biology and recent advances of storage technologies in sugarcane. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 33, e00696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00705

Rafiq, M.; Ahmed, R.; Rana, I. A.; Ahsan, M.; Ahmad, S. Expression of sucrose metabolizing enzymes in different sugarcane varieties under progressive heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1269521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1269521

Oliveira, T.; Santos, H.; Mendes, A. Climate variability and sugar accumulation in sugarcane: Implications for harvest scheduling. Agric. Syst. 2020, 185, 102950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102950

Sukkasem, T.; Sittichok, K.; Chompuchan, C. An analysis of drought in Phetchaburi River Basin using TVDI derived from MODIS data. ASEAN J. Sci. Technol. Rep. 2020, 23(2), e240086. https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tsujournal/article/view/240086

Prasad, R.; Mehta, V.; Sharma, K. Application of spectrophotometry in sugarcane sucrose purity analysis. J. Sugarcane Res. 2020, 10(2), 76–84.

Rani, S.; Meena, K. UV–Vis spectroscopy for sugarcane maturity determination. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2023, 18(2), 134–141.

Khawsung, T.; Utaipan, T.; Treewanjutha, W. Smartphone-based spectrophotometer for facile and fast determination of lipid peroxidation in local fried food. ASEAN J. Sci. Technol. Rep. 2024, 27(2), e252346. https://doi.org/10.55164/ajstr.v27i2.252346

Tinnam, P.; Yodpijit, N.; Junsupasen, S.; Sappakittipakorn, M.; Jongprasithporn, M. Reduction of sound pressure levels with noise barriers containing agricultural residues: Case study. ASEAN J. Sci. Technol. Rep. 2025, 28(3), e257762. https://doi.org/10.55164/ajstr.v28i3.257762

Anuradha, S.; Nair, A. Digital refractometry as a reliable tool for assessing sugarcane maturity. J. Crop Sci. Technol. 2020, 9(2), 45–52.

Silva, F.; Barbosa, L.; Souza, C. Digital refractometry in determining sugarcane maturity stages. Sugar Tech 2021, 23(3), 654–662.

Barbosa Júnior, M. R.; Moreira, B. R. A.; de Oliveira, R. P.; Shiratsuchi, L. S.; da Silva, R. P. UAV imagery data and machine learning: A driving merger for predictive analysis of qualitative yield in sugarcane. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1101934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1114852

Aparatana, K.; Naomasa, Y.; Sano, M.; Watanabe, K.; Mitsuoka, M.; Ueno, M.; Kawamitsu, Y.; Taira, E. Predicting sugarcane quality using a portable visible near infrared spectrometer and a benchtop near infrared spectrometer. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2023, 31(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.1145

Cabral, M. R.; Belon, A. R.; da Silva, S. A. Influence of phenolic compounds on color formation at different stages of the VHP sugar manufacturing process. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24455-4

Khan, M. S.; Mahmood, A.; Ashraf, M.; Rashid, M.; Iqbal, J.; Awan, S. I.; Ali, A. Morphological, agronomical, physiological and molecular characterization of a high sugar mutant of sugarcane. PLOS ONE 2022, 17(3), e0264990.

Subramanian, S.; Krishnan, R.; Ramesh, B. Affordable maturity assessment techniques for smallholder sugarcane farmers. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2024, 94(1), 12–20.

Kumar, S.; Patel, R.; Joshi, D. Integrated use of spectrophotometry and refractometry for sugarcane maturity analysis. Agric. Eng. Today 2023, 47(3), 45–54.

Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, Q. Combining refractometry and spectroscopy for improved sugarcane maturity prediction. Sensors 2022, 22(8), 3156.

Singh, H.; Meena, R. S.; Kumar, S.; Meena, V. S. Effect of harvesting ages on yield and yield components of sugar cane varieties cultivated at Finchaa Sugar Factory. Adv. Agric. 2021, Article 9936195.

Yusoff, M. N. H.; Zulkifli, N. W. M.; Sukiman, N. L.; Chyuan, O. H.; Hassan, M. H.; Hasnul, M. H.; Mamat, R. Physicochemical properties of sugarcane juice in relation to maturity. J. Phys. Sci. 2020, 31(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21315/jps2020.31.2.1

Heenkenda, S.; Romero, D. A. Estimating sugarcane maturity using high spatial resolution remote sensing images. Drones 2024, 4(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030024

Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988.

Chandra, P.; Yadav, R.; Mishra, A. Evaluating sugarcane harvest timing using digital refractometry. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2023, 18(1), 112–120.

Gómez, M. A.; Ruiz, J. L.; Torres, F. Sugarcane maturity assessment under variable climates in Latin America. Agronomy 2022, 12(5), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051123