Development and Evaluation of a Web-based Training Project Management System for Administrative Digitalization in Higher Education

Main Article Content

Nitchanan Kawiwangsakul
Phatnutsooda Jaruteerapan
Natthapon Sanchai
Rujira Thinsaphung
Sasiwan Thaepngoen

Abstract

Administrative digitalization in higher education institutions (HEIs) extends beyond pedagogical technologies and requires the reengineering of internal administrative workflows. This study reports the development and evaluation of a web-based Training Project Management System for a faculty of management science at a public university operating under resource constraints. A Research and Development design was employed. The system was built with PHP and MySQL following a structured system development life cycle, and its technical quality was assessed by a panel of five information systems specialists using the ISO/IEC 25010 quality model (𝑥̄ = 4.60). End-user acceptance was then evaluated with 300 lecturers, administrative staff, and students using a 24-item instrument covering perceived ease of use, information quality, system responsiveness, functional suitability, performance efficiency, and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.731–0.858). Construct means ranged from 3.16 to 3.58, indicating moderate to high acceptance, with perceived ease of use rated highest (𝑥̄ = 3.58) and information quality lowest (𝑥̄ = 3.16); overall satisfaction averaged 3.44. Correlation analysis found no meaningful association between the six quality dimensions and overall satisfaction (r = −0.121 to 0.105), so the data do not support conclusions about which quality attributes drive satisfaction in this setting. The study contributes a documented, low-cost development and evaluation procedure for faculty-level administrative systems, together with a transparent account of what its evaluation data can and cannot establish.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

[1] Castro Benavides, L. M.; Tamayo Arias, J. A.; Arango Serna, M. D.; Branch Bedoya, J. W.; Burgos, D. Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2020, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291

[2] Antonopoulou, K.; Begkos, C.; Zhu, Z. Staying Afloat Amidst Extreme Uncertainty: A Case Study of Digital Transformation in Higher Education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2023, 192, 122603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122603

[3] Kayanja, W.; Kyambade, M.; Kiggundu, T. Exploring Digital Transformation in Higher Education Setting: The Shift to Fully Automated and Paperless Systems. Cogent Educ. 2025, 12(1), 2489800. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2489800

[4] Khatir, N.; Madani, H. The Impact of Digital Transformation on Achieving Outstanding Performance in Educational Administration. Int. J. Educ. Manage. 2024, 38(7), 1821–1838. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2023-0289

[5] Gkrimpizi, T.; Peristeras, V.; Magnisalis, I. Classification of Barriers to Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13(7), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746

[6] DeLone, W. H.; McLean, E. R. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

[7] Tatomyr, I.; Kvasnii, L.; Shulzhyk, Y., Eds. Global Digital Trends and Their Impact on National Economic Progress; OKTAN PRINT: Praha, Czech Republic, 2024; 418 pp. https://doi.org/10.46489/gdtatione-05-24

[8] Azzahra, S. F.; Ramadani, L.; Rahmad, B. Integrating System Quality, Information Quality, and Service Quality for Evaluating IS Quality. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise and Industrial Systems (ICOEINS 2023); Atlantis Press, 2023; pp 206–218. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-340-5_19

[9] International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Systems and Software Engineering—Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)—System and Software Quality Models; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.

[10] Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[11] Dwivedi, Y. K.; Rana, N. P.; Jeyaraj, A.; Clement, M.; Williams, M. D. Re-Examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, 21, 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y

[12] Hair, J. F.; Black, W. C.; Babin, B. J.; Anderson, R. E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning, 2019.

[13] DeVellis, R. F. Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications, 2017.

[14] Krejcie, R. V.; Morgan, D. W. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

[15] Valacich, J.; George, J. Modern Systems Analysis and Design, 9th ed.; Pearson Education, 2020.

[16] Canlas, R. B.; Piad, K. C.; Lagman, A. C. An ISO/IEC 25010 Based Software Quality Assessment of a Faculty Research Productivity Monitoring and Prediction System. In Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Conference on Information Technology: IoT and Smart City (ICIT 2021); Guangzhou, China, December 22–25, 2021; ACM: New York, NY, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512576.3512619

[17] Ng’wanakilala, M.; Ngudungi, C. C. Explore the Challenges Encountered in Implementing the E-Office System for Mail Management: A Case Study of the University of Dodoma (UDOM). East Afr. J. Inf. Technol. 2026, 9(1), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajit.9.1.4991

[18] Gasaymeh, A.; Matrouk, K.; AlMohtadi, R. Faculty Members’ Attitudes and Perceptions toward the Digitization of the Scientific Research Management System at Al-Hussein Bin Talal University: A Qualitative Study Guided by a Modified Version of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Front. Commun. 2026, 11, 1849212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1849212