Physicochemical, rheology quality and sensory acceptance of alternative yogurt products from Tubtim Chumphae rice (RD69)

Authors

  • Parinya Boonarsa Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Maha Sarakham, 44150
  • Kittipak Choowong Kanlayanawat School, Nai Mueang, Muang Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, 40000

Keywords:

Oryza sativa L., plant yogurt, Fermentation, Rheological properties, Consumer acceptance

Abstract

Tubtim Chumphae rice (Oryza sativa L.; RD69) is an indigenous rice variety with strong potential as a functional ingredient for the development of plant-based food products. This study aimed to develop an alternative yogurt from Tubtim Chumphae rice by blending Tubtim Chumphae rice milk with soy milk at ratios of 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1, and to investigate their effects on physicochemical properties, flow behavior, and sensory acceptance. During fermentation (0–6 h), the pH of all formulations decreased from approximately 7.0 to 4.17–4.37, while titratable acidity increased to 0.42–0.48%. The 1:2 formulation, containing the highest proportion of soy milk, exhibited the lowest pH (4.17) and the highest lactic acid bacteria count (7.00 × 10⁹ CFU/g), which was approximately 11.7-fold higher than that of the 2:1 formulation, indicating more efficient lactic acid production. All yogurt samples exhibited non-Newtonian shear-thinning behavior. The 1:2 formulation showed the strongest gel structure, with the highest firmness value (0.87 N), which was approximately 3.6 times higher than that of the 2:1 formulation. In contrast, the 2:1 formulation exhibited the highest syneresis, approximately 1.1 times greater than that of the 1:2 formulation, reflecting a weaker water-holding capacity. Increasing the proportion of Tubtim Chumphae rice milk also intensified the characteristic reddish-purple color of the product. In terms of sensory evaluation, the 2:1 formulation received significantly higher scores for viscosity and overall liking. In conclusion, the ratio of Tubtim Chumphae rice milk to soy milk significantly influenced the quality, texture, and consumer acceptance of plant-based alternative yogurt, highlighting its potential for further commercial development.

References

Akarca, G., & Denizkara, A. J. (2024). Changes of quality in yoghurt produced under magnetic field effect

during fermentation and storage processes. International Dairy Journal, 150, 105841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105841

Akgun, A., Yazici, F., & Gulec, H. A. (2018). The combined effect of probiotic cultures and incubation final PH on the quality of buffalo milk yogurt during cold storage. Food Science & Nutrition, 6(2), 492–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.580

Arena, M. P., Caggianiello, G., Russo, P., Albenzio, M., Massa, S., Fiocco, D., Capozzi, V., & Spano, G. (2015). Functional Starters for Functional Yogurt. Foods, 4(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods4010015

Boonarsa, P., Nakagawa, K., Banlue, K., & Siriamornpun, S. (2025). Enhancement of nutritional and textural properties of meat analogues using silkworm pupae powder via freeze alignment technique. Food Chemistry: X, 27, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102370

Chaiyaporn, S., & Choenkwan, S. (2022). Processing of Tubtim ChumphaeRice (RD69) of Ban Khok Sawang Housewives Group Community Enterprise, Wang Yai District, Khon Kaen Province. Journal of Community Development and Life Quality, 10(2), 148–158. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JCDLQ/article/view/254996

Chartveing, P., Nipapond Kunna, & Panatda Phugsin. (2024). An application of tubtim chumphae brown rice flour for big flat noodle’s product. Journal of Sustainable Home Economics and Culture, 6(2), 58–71. https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hecrmutp/article/view/3960

Delikanli, B., & Ozcan, T. (2017). Improving the textural properties of yogurt fortified with milk proteins: textural properties of yogurt. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41(5), e13101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13101

Demi̇r, H., Simsek, M., & Yıldırım, G. (2021). Effect of oat milk pasteurization type on the characteristics of yogurt. LWT, 135, 110271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110271

Denholm, S. J., Brand, W., Mitchell, A. P., Wells, A. T., Krzyzelewski, T., Smith, S. L., Wall, E., & Coffey, M. P. (2020). Predicting bovine tuberculosis status of dairy cows from mid-infrared spectral data of milk using deep learning. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(10), 9355–9367. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18328

Farnworth, E. R., Mainville, I., Desjardins, M.-P., Gardner, N., Fliss, I., & Champagne, C. (2007). Growth of probiotic bacteria and bifidobacteria in a soy yogurt formulation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 116(1), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.12.015

Gilbert, A., & Turgeon, S. L. (2021). Studying stirred yogurt microstructure and its correlation to physical properties: A review. Food Hydrocolloids, 121, 106970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106970

Greis, M., Sainio, T., Katina, K., Nolden, A. A., Kinchla, A. J., Seppä, L., & Partanen, R. (2022). Physicochemical properties and mouthfeel in commercial plant-based yogurts. Foods, 11(7), 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070941

Le Ba, T., Dam, M. S., Nguyen, L. L. P., Baranyai, L., & Kaszab, T. (2025). A review of processing techniques and rheological properties of yogurts. Journal of Texture Studies, 56(1), e70006. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.70006

Marete, P. K., Mariga, A. M., Huka, G., Musalia, L., Marete, E., Mathara, J. M., & Arimi, J. M. (2024). Effects of optimizing fermentation time and stabilizers using response surface methodology on physicochemical properties of camel milk yoghurt. Applied Food Research, 4(2), 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2024.100469

Matela, K. S., Pillai, M. K., & Thamae, T. (2019). Evaluation of pH, titratable acidity, syneresis and sensory profiles of someyoghurt samples from the Kingdom of Lesotho. Food Research, 693–697. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.3(6).177

Montemurro, M., Pontonio, E., Coda, R., & Rizzello, C. G. (2021). Plant-based alternatives to yogurt: state-of-the-art and perspectives of new biotechnological challenges. Foods, 10(2), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020316

Pang, Z., Safdar, B., Wang, Y., Sun, M., & Liu, X. (2021). Improvement of tribo-rheological properties of acid soymilk gels by reinforcement of 7S or 11S proteins. Food Hydrocolloids, 110, 106173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106173

Rungruang, R., Modsuwan, J., Srisukong, A., & Kaisangsri, N. (2019). Antioxidant and anti-wrinkle activities of tubtim chumphae rice extract for application in facial cosmetics. KMUTT Research and Development Journal, 42(1), 95–107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339400708_Antioxidant_and_Anti-wrinkle_Activities_of_Tubtim_Chumphae_Rice_Extract_for_Application_in_Facial_Cosmetics

Sahasakul, Y., Aursalung, A., Thangsiri, S., Temviriyanukul, P., Inthachat, W., Pongwichian, P., Sasithorn, K., & Suttisansanee, U. (2025). The effect of planting time on nutrients, phenolics, and antioxidant activities of rice grown in different soil salinities. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 12567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97864-w

Sengupta, S., Bhattacharyya, D. K., Goswami, R., & Bhowal, J. (2019). Emulsions stabilized by soy protein nanoparticles as potential functional non‐dairy yogurts. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(13), 5808–5818. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9851

Shori, A. B., & Baba, A. S. (2012). Viability of lactic acid bacteria and sensory evaluation in Cinnamomum verum and Allium sativum -bio-yogurts made from camel and cow milk. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences, 11(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaubas.2011.11.001

Wu, T., Deng, C., Luo, S., Liu, C., & Hu, X. (2023). Effect of rice bran on properties of yogurt: Comparison between addition of bran before fermentation and after fermentation. Food Hydrocolloids, 135, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108122

Yilmaz-Ersan, L., & Topcuoglu, E. (2022). Evaluation of instrumental and sensory measurements using multivariate analysis in probiotic yogurt enriched with almond milk. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 59(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-04994-w

Downloads

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

Boonarsa, P., & Choowong, K. . (2026). Physicochemical, rheology quality and sensory acceptance of alternative yogurt products from Tubtim Chumphae rice (RD69). Journal of Science, Technology and Agriculture Research, 7(1), 28–36. retrieved from https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ScienceRERU/article/view/262729