Hybrid Digital Money for Digital Economy Development

Main Article Content

Panuchart Bunyakiati

Abstract


This paper presents the design of digital money in the modern context, encompassing both centralized systems and decentralized systems, and compares their advantages and limitations in terms of scalability, programmability, and trust models. The study employs three case studies: the Digital Yuan (e-CNY), Centralized Exchanges (CEX), and Potomac Parametric Insurance Platform. Centralized systems demonstrate high efficiency, scalability, and usability, supporting large-scale adoption, while blockchain and smart contracts offer strong advantages in automation and transparency but face limitations in user experience. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the concept of Hybrid Digital Money, which integrates payment infrastructure with business logic on blockchain. This approach aims to create a system that achieves efficiency, transparency, and composability, thereby supporting the development of the future digital economy.


Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” 2008. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

A. Narayanan, J. Bonneau, E. Felten, A. Miller, and S. Goldfeder, Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies, Princeton University Press, 2016.

International Monetary Fund, “Digital Money Across Borders: Macro-Financial Implications,” 2020.

S. Ammous, The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking, John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

V. Buterin, “Why sharding is great: demystifying the technical properties,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/04/07/sharding.html

V. Buterin, “An Incomplete Guide to Rollups,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/01/05/rollup.html

E. Kokoris-Kogias et al., “OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding,” in Proc. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2018.

Ethereum Foundation, “Proof of Stake,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ethereum.org/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/pos/

J. Poon and T. Dryja, “The Bitcoin Lightning Network: Scalable Off-Chain Instant Payments,” 2016.

M. Iansiti and K. R. Lakhani, “The Truth About Blockchain,” Harvard Business Review, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain

R. K. Quayle’s, “Parachute Pants and Central Bank Money,” Federal Reserve, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/quarles20210628a.htm

ธนาคารแห่งประเทศไทย, “พร้อมเพย์ (PromptPay),” [ออนไลน์]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://www.bot.or.th/en/financial-innovation/digital-finance/digital-payment/promptpay.html (เข้าถึงเมื่อ มี.ค. 2569)

บริษัท เนชั่นแนล ไอทีเอ็มเอ๊กซ์ จำกัด, “สถิติและรายงานการใช้งานพร้อมเพย์,” ม.ค. 2569.

บ. ทองขลิบ, “ระบบเอสโครว์ (Escrow) กับการขายทอดตลาด,” กรมบังคับคดี, 2566. [ออนไลน์]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://sub.led.go.th/develop/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Escrow_system-1.pdf

Deutsche Bundesbank, “Money in Programmable Applications: Cross-Sector Perspectives from the German Economy,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/855148/ebaab681009124d4331e8e327cfaf97c/mL/2020-12-21-programmierbare-zahlung-anlage-data.pdf

H. Kalodner et al., “Arbitrum: Scalable, Private Smart Contracts,” in Proc. USENIX Security Symposium, 2018.

People’s Bank of China, “Progress of Research & Development of e-CNY in China,” 2021.

D. Vidal-Tomás, “Centralized Exchanges & Proof-of-Solvency: The Guardians of Trust,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, vol. 103, 2025.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, “In re FTX Trading Ltd., et al.,” Case No. 22-11068 (JTD), Nov. 2022.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, “In re Celsius Network LLC, et al.,” Case No. 22-10964 (MG), Jul. 2022.

“Potomac: Parametric Insurance Platform for Climate Risk,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.potomachq.co