The research, design and development of a central data center for higher education institutions Northeastern University

Abstract

           The objectives of this research are to 1) design and develop a central data center for higher education institutions, Northeastern Universities, 2) evaluate the performance of central data centers for higher education institutions, Northeastern Universities, and 3) study the satisfaction of central data center usage for higher education institutions. According to the SDLC theory, the target group used to evaluate the system performance is three computer experts and those involved in educational work. The target group was used to study the satisfaction of the system 100 people. The tools used in the research were the Northeastern University Information Management System, Efficiency Assessment Form for Central University Information System, Northeastern University, Revenue Questionnaire and Acceptance Queering for users of the Northeast University Central Data Management System. Statistics used in the research were Average and Standard Deviation.

          The results showed that 1) the design and development of a central data center for higher education institutions, northeastern universities, can be used in practice by developing an information system that is a central information center for education organizations, consisting of 4 information systems: 1) personnel performance collection system, 2) academic performance assessment system, 3) personnel performance evaluation system, 4) student activity monitoring system, personnel inside and outside northeastern universities have access to the data according to the scope of licensing as defined by the system and meet the needs of users, 2) the results of the central data center performance assessment for higher education institutions, from the experts with the highest overall assessment result ( =4.85, S.D. = 0.36), and 3) the results of the central data center user satisfaction study for higher education institutions from the target group. Overall assessment results were at the highest level ( =4.80, S.D. = 0.40) and 4) the most level of the system user acceptance study ( =4.86, SD. = 0.34).