THE APPROACH TO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN THAT FOCUSES ON STUDENT-CENTERED THROUGH DESIGN THINKING PROCESS AND GENERATIVE AI Academic Articles

Main Article Content

Waris Rattananimit
Benjamaporn Jantorn
Suthida Chaichomchuen

Abstract

This article explores the promotion of learning and student engagement through various approaches, particularly design thinking, which effectively fosters essential 21st-century skills. The integration of generative AI into instructional design enables the precise customization of content and pedagogical strategies to meet the individual needs of learners. When applied in conjunction with generative AI, the design thinking process supports a student-centered learning environment by actively engaging students in the problem-solving process. To implement this approach effectively, teachers must develop competencies in utilizing design thinking as a pedagogical framework. These competencies encompass three key components: 1. Knowledge—a thorough understanding of both the design thinking process and the relevant technologies; 2. Skills—the ability to communicate effectively and promote creative and critical thinking; and 3. Attitudes—openness and flexibility in adapting instructional methods to the diverse and evolving needs of learners. The goal of this integrated approach is to cultivate meaningful and personalized learning experiences. Moreover, the researcher points out that there are ethical considerations when employing artificial intelligence in education. Teachers and educational practitioners must remain aware of the technological limitations and ensure that AI is implemented in a safe, responsible, and effective manner. Such awareness contributes to maximizing the benefits of AI while safeguarding the integrity and equity of the learning experience.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
W. Rattananimit, B. . Jantorn, and S. . Chaichomchuen, “THE APPROACH TO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN THAT FOCUSES ON STUDENT-CENTERED THROUGH DESIGN THINKING PROCESS AND GENERATIVE AI : Academic Articles”, JSCI-SBU, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–102, Jun. 2025.
Section
Academic Article

References

I. Smith and A. Wisetsuwann, “Learner-centered learning management,” J. Educ., Faculty of Educ., Srinakharinwirot Univ., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2006. (in Thai)

K. Kuwasanon and P. Sothayapetch, “Promoting student-centered learning components for learner competency development,” J. Educ., Silpakorn Univ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan.–Jun. 2023. (in Thai)

A. Wongjumpa and P. Supat, “Learner-centered learning: Context of mathematics/science teaching management,” J. Res. Dev., Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat Univ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 182–192, 2018. (in Thai)

S. Senman, V. Napapong, and C. Cherngchao, “Student-centered learning using hyperquest lessons,” J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2011. (in Thai)

V. Saengnimitrchaikul, “Student-centered learning: A case study of teaching and learning in child and adolescent nursing course, Faculty of Nursing, Thammasat University,” J. Nurs. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 64–76, 2012. (in Thai)

N. Jiamthong and P. Wibooncharoensuk, “Design thinking-based learning management for elementary school students,” J. Roi Kaensarn Acad., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 573–586, 2023. (in Thai)

K. Suwannarak, “Promoting learning management competencies with design thinking process to enhance innovation capabilities,” Kurusart J., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 32–42, 2023. (in Thai)

R. Balcaitis, “Design thinking models. Stanford d.school. Empathize IT,” Empathize IT, Jun. 15, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://empathizeit.com/design-thinking-models-stanford-d-school/. [Accessed: Feb. 14, 2024].

M. S. Houssaini, “Strategic agility in crisis: Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic,” J. Bus. Strategy, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 123–145, 2024.

M. Asanok, “The integration of design thinking process for developing learning management innovation,” J. Educ. Technol. Commun., Faculty of Educ., Mahasarakham Univ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2018. (in Thai)

S. Lekhanukan, P. Pongsopon, C. Faikhamta, and E. Chantharakhante, “Teaching performance of science teachers on design thinking,” J. Educ., Naresuan Univ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 370–380, 2022. (in Thai)

C. Chalermsuk, S. Chaweepat, T. Srithananan, and A. Konguthai, “The impact of using GitHub Copilot on the learning process and computer programming skills of students,” in Proc. 11th Southeast Asia Interdisciplinary Nat. Conf. 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, 2024, pp. 246–253.

K. Kosila and J. Thongthirat, “The use of PowerChatGPT for digital teaching and learning management,” J. Vocational Res. Innov., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 92–97, 2024. (in Thai)

P. Phanitpichetwong, C. Pattaranurakgul, N. Naran, and A. Limyothin, “Guidelines for applying generative artificial intelligence technology for teaching and learning in higher education,” J. Bangkokthonburi Univ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2024. (in Thai)

A. Sreenivasan and M. Suresh, “Enabling technologies influencing the start-up operations 5.0,” Oper. Manag. Res., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 869–890, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12063-024-00480-6.

R. Yilmaz and F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz, “The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy, and motivation,” Comput. Educ.: Artif. Intell., vol. 4, p. 100147, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147.

H. R. Saeidnia and M. Ausloos, “Integrating artificial intelligence into design thinking: A comprehensive examination of the principles and potentialities of AI for design thinking framework,” InfoSci. Trends, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.61186/ist.202401.01.09.

K. Mingsiritham, “ChatGPT and digital education,” Silpakorn Educ. Res. J., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2023. (in Thai)

A. Dalgıç, E. Yaşar, and M. Demir, “ChatGPT and learning outcomes in tourism education: The role of digital literacy and individualized learning,” J. Hosp. Leisure, Sport Tour. Educ., vol. 34, p. 100481, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2024.100481.

J. Dempere, K. Modugu, A. Hesham, and L. K. Ramasamy, “The impact of ChatGPT on higher education,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, p. 1206936, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936.

D. Poleac, “Strategic management in times of crisis: A blue ocean approach in the restaurant industry,” Int. J. Strategic Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.3844/ajebasp.2014.49.57.

P. Krittaphon, S. Vorachai, S. Mongkol, and D. Thodpong, “Issues in the use of artificial intelligence in education,” SE Asian Univ. J. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 224–235, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s12063-024-00480-6. (in Thai)